Assumption I must be valid because only then does the storage make sense. Further, the statement has nothing to do with ''a shorter period of time''. Hence, Assumption II is invalid.
Assumption I is invalid as the given statement does not focus on health. The sentence 'if farmers want to improve their yield' proves that Assumption II is hidden in the given statement because the word 'improve' itself hints towards the increase of production. Hence, Assumption II implicit.
Both the statements follow, as the faith in the prayer and good deeds lead the person towards success.
On the basic of statement, it is not certain that present rates are very low. We cannot say that increasing the rates is the only way to meet the deficit. Hence, none of the assumptions is implicit.
Assumption I that Indian unemployed youths need monetary support is the solid base for providing allowances to all the unemployed youths. However, Assumption II that the Government has sufficient funds does not give valid reason. Hence, only Assumption I is implicit.
Assumption I is not related with the statement, hence it is not implicit in the statement. Assumption II is implicit as it gives the solid base for the fact defined in the statement.
Assumption I is not implicit as it has no connection with the given statement. The need to grow different types of crops is talked about precisely because there is a likelihood of farmers growing the same crop again and again unless instructed. Further, growing different types of crops is impotent but not sufficient. Therefore, Assumption II is also not valid.
Assumption I is implicit. The reason is that if the Government has taken such a decision, it must have assumed that its implementation would be possible. Argument II is not implicit because on the basis of given statement it cannot be said with surety that sufficient amount of bio-fuel can be produced in the country. It is possible that the Government has import on its mind for the said purpose.
No doubts, Assumption I is implicit in the need for training but what happens in case of II? It takes things to an extreme with the phrase ''no skill sets''. Hence Assumption II is an invalid assumption.
Assumption I is not implicit as there may be several reasons for the preference being stated (taking a ferry or s boat). Assumption II is very much valid because we ask someone to employ a means only when we assume the availability of that particular means.
Assumption I is not implicit because nothing is mentioned about the later information by the detergent. Further, detergent should be used as they clean clothes better and more easily. Hence Assumption II is implicit.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.