'Retirement from international cricket' means Shoaib does not play test cricket now as test cricket is a part of the international cricket. Hence, Assumption I is implicit. Assumption II is also implicit because it is clearly said that Shoaib targeted Tendulkar through his book and book is a write up.
Here, the manager stresses the need to appoint more subordinate officers. It does mean that present staff is not efficient. In fact, he wants to say that work is much more then the working capacity of present staff strength. Hence, Assumption II is invalid. But Assumption I is implicit because without assuming the availability or subordinate officers, the manager would not have said so.
Assumption I is implicit as if it had not been possible India would not have won after follow on. Further, the word 'surprising' tells that winning after follow on is very difficult and this is the reason it happens only 2nd time. But if it is possible, we cannot say that India will not repeat such victory again. Hence, Assumption II is invalid.
The fact that historians have done harm by distorting truth, means that people believe what is reported by the historians. So, I is implicit. II does not follow from the statement and so is not implicit.
The civic authority has advised residents to keep away from mosquitoes to avert the risk of malaria. Such an advice would surely be adhered to by the people. So, II is not implicit. Besides, it has been advised to use mosquito repellents or nets. This means that people can afford to buy the same. So, I is implicit.
Clearly, it cannot be deduced as to which day Kartik would reach Delhi. But Kartik has left for Delhi to attend a function to be held on Friday. So, he must have planned his journey to reach Delhi before Friday. Thus, only II is implicit.
Any decision is taken assuming that it will be useful. Hence, none of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.
The 'X'- airlines has decide to increased the fares assumption that it will not affect its business adversely. Therefore, Assumption I is implicit in the statement. Other airlines may or may not follow this pursuit.
Both the assumptions are implicit in the statement. the point which is highlighted in any advertisement is liked by people.
The given statement does not mean imprisonment is necessary. Nelson Mandela's dedicated service to the nation and his struggle for freedom, despite so many hardships won him the desired public appeal to be elected the President. Hence, neither I nor II is implicit.
The Given statement hints that in recent years, the number of people traveling by air has increased. This implies that large number of travelers can now afford air travel. Hence, only II is a valid assumption.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.