The move to make use of alcometers must have been necessitated because of the large number of accidents. Hence I is implicit. II is implicit from the fact that it will identify drunken drives.
The assumptions are not implicit because it is possible that the minister has neither of these convictions but is acting under sheer political compulsion.
The VC is assuming I; that is why he has restricted wearing western dresses on the campus. We can't relate their studies with their dress and hence assumption II is not implicit.
Both may be conclusions, but not assumptions.
I is not implicit. Maybe, the "you" here refers only to the elite. But II is implicit; that is why "adrenaline kicks in" on opening the papers.
Both the assumptions are implicit. This is why the speaker believes that consumers are "deceived"
The statement is merely a report while I is a value -judgment. Hence it is not implicit. II is implicit from "irregular water supply".
Film stars are public figures and popular so they can gather more crowd. And assuming this, the political leader has invited them to pull the crowd. Hence II is implicit.
Companies like Indian Airlines regard conferring of such largesse on popular figures like Dr Amartya Sen as a standing publicity of its own. Hence both the assumptions are implicit.
When the High Court passes an order, it assumes I. II is not implicit because the court has merely assumed that the film is controversial. Whether it is objectionable will be established only when the decision is finally taken.
Why the need to use the electronic voting machine? Chief Election Commissioner is definitely assuming I. Any system won't be recommended if it is not convenient to use for common people. Hence II is implicit.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.