Both may be conclusions, but not assumptions.
I is not implicit. Maybe, the "you" here refers only to the elite. But II is implicit; that is why "adrenaline kicks in" on opening the papers.
Both the assumptions are implicit. This is why the speaker believes that consumers are "deceived"
The sentence should not be taken too literally.
Talks for second tranche is expected only after talks for the first tranche have been finalised. But the actual amount may still be in the pipeline.
I is implicit from the " difference" being pointed out. II is beyond the scope of the statement.
The VC is assuming I; that is why he has restricted wearing western dresses on the campus. We can't relate their studies with their dress and hence assumption II is not implicit.
The assumptions are not implicit because it is possible that the minister has neither of these convictions but is acting under sheer political compulsion.
The move to make use of alcometers must have been necessitated because of the large number of accidents. Hence I is implicit. II is implicit from the fact that it will identify drunken drives.
The statement is merely a report while I is a value -judgment. Hence it is not implicit. II is implicit from "irregular water supply".
Film stars are public figures and popular so they can gather more crowd. And assuming this, the political leader has invited them to pull the crowd. Hence II is implicit.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.