I is not strong because the argument is not directly related to the core issue. II is argument because it depicts the seamy side witnessed in absence of a censor board for advertisement.
The Multiples of 18 are 18, 36, 54, 72, 90, 108, 126, ....
None focuses on the real reason of unemployability.
Only Course of action I can follow as public awareness programme should be expanded immediately.
Both courses of action are suitable for pursuing.
Courses of action I would be a extreme step. Courses of action II is not within the Government's preview. Courses of action III is advisable when there is retrenchment on such a large scale.
To avoid such in mishappening, deploying police constables can be of help. Also, if people go in groups, then such incidents be avoid.
Going for I is an extreme action and should be resorted to only when the students fail to behave themselves after repeated warnings like the one given in II.
Action I and III will create another problems action II is the effective way to reduce the problem.
We should remember that the culprits are mere students. Going for II instead of I would make sense only if it is a repeated act.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.