Discussion
Home ‣ Verbal Reasoning ‣ Statement and Argument Comments
- Question
- Statement:
Should a person found sending racist messages on internet be prosecuted?
Arguments:
I. Yes, sending racist email message is a part of overall phenomenon of ''hate-speech'' on the internet which is meant for civil communication.
II. No, our constitution provides us freedom of speech; than why prosecution?
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong
- Correct Answer
- if only argument I is strong
ExplanationI is obviously strong. II is weak because freedom of speech does not mean sending racist messages.
- 1. Statement:
Should people be allowed to rear endangered species like musk deer for commercial purposes?
Arguments:
I. Yes, prosperity of a nation depends upon the prosperity of its citizens. If more options of earning will be there before a citizen he/she will certainly become wealthy .
II. No, people have no right to fulfill their commercial desire by marking endangered species more endangered or extinct.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 2. Statement:
Should registration of marriages be made mandatory for Indian citizens?
Arguments:
I. Yes, This will help in legal processes when any problem related whit marriages erupts. Besides, it will also be helpful for government while planning activities ,etc.
II. No, those thing which bring spouses closer must be devoid of red-tapism.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 3. Statement:
Should private courier services be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, a lot of manipulation regarding charges has been witnessed by many courier services.
II. No, private services always provide better services than other.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 4. Statement:
Should there be a ban on surnames which reflect the cast and religion of persons?
Arguments:
I. Yes, This move will encourage communal harmony which is very much desirable in secular states like India.
II. No, It is against our old social customs and traditions.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 5. Statement:
Should there be a ban on using mobile phones while driving vehicles?
Arguments:
I. No. This will affect the basic purpose of keeping a mobile phone.
II. Yes. Two works simultaneously should not be permissible.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 6. Statement:
Should basic operators be allowed to offer wireless telephony services in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes; enhanced competition will bring down the prices for the consumer.
II. No; this will make it cumbersome for the regulators.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 7. Statement:
Should religious slaughter of animals be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes,. this is an act of brutality and against humanity; it should not be done in the name of God.
II. No, India is a secular country.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 8. Statement:
Should India attack Pakistan?
Arguments:
I. Yes, we have defeated them three times; now it needs another defeat.
II. No, if India succeeds in the fourth war, we will have no opponent left a fifth war.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 9. Statement:
Should politicians be made to declare their educational qualifications?
Arguments:
I. Yes, to develop a global perspective and represent India on the world map it is the need of the hour because a sound educational background guarantees some degree of understanding of the needs of the nation.
II. No, what do we need ___ a leader an academic?
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 10. Statement:
Are beauty pageants an insult to a woman's intelligence?
Arguments:
I. Yes, beauty pageants give more emphasis on physical beauty.
II. No, if anyone thinks so, he or she is not aware of the positive aspects of beauty pageants.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
Statement and Argument problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
I is weak because it does not hit at the main question ___''rearing endangered species''. II is weak because it assumes that rearing musk deer will diminish their number. Experience, on the other hand, tells us that rearing of a species for commercial purposes only adds to its number.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I is strong : it reveals the very purpose of registration of marriages. II is an absurd argument.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Any private services can't be banned only because there are charges against manipulation which can be rectified by legal actions. Hence I weak. II is also weak because of the word 'always'.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Both communal harmony and furthering of social customs are desirable.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Basic purpose of keeping a mobile phone is to facilitate mobile holders to be in touch whit the outside would. This purpose will not be affected even after the implementation of the move. Hence , I is weak. II is ambiguous.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I goes into reason. Hence I is strong . II is weak because it is not advocating whether despite being cumbersome for the regulators it is beneficial for the people or not.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
I is strong because it goes into reason and keeps humanity above all. II is also strong because being a secular country India needs to respect the freedom of all religions.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Both arguments are ridiculous. Neither of them says about the positive or negative aspect which compels India to attack or restrain itself to take such harsh initiatives.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I goes into reason. Hence is strong. II is based on wrong assumption.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
I is not strong because ''more emphasis'' on one aspect can't be interpreted as an insult to the other aspect. II does not carry any substance.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Verbal Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.