Discussion
Home ‣ Verbal Reasoning ‣ Statement and Argument Comments
- Question
- Statement
Should there be a complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India?
Arguments
I. Yes this is the only way to sustain present rate of technological development in India.
II. No, the Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes a significant part of foreign exchange reserve.
III. No, the practical knowledge gained by Indians working in other countries help India to develop its economy.
Options- A. None is strong
- B. All are strong
- C. I and II are strong
- D. Only III is strong
- Correct Answer
- None is strong
ExplanationNone of the given arguments is strong.
- 1. Statement
Should there be a complete ban on registration of new cars for a few months in the big cities in India?
Arguments
I. Yes, this will singnificantly reduce the number of cars on the already overcrowded roads of the big cities in India.
II. Yes, the exisiting car owners will very happy as they will face less traffic snarls in peak hours.
III. No, this is highly discriminatory against those whose decided to buy cars now ans hence should not be enforced.
Options- A. Only 1 is strong
- B. Only I and III are strong
- C. Only III is strong
- D. All are strong Discuss
- 2. Statement
Should there be only few banks in place of numerous smaller banks in India?
Arguments
I. Yes, This will help secure the investor's money as these big banks will be able to withstand intermittent market related shocks.
II. No, A large number of people will lose their jobs as after the merger many employees will be redundant.
III. Yes, This will help consolidate the entire banking industry and will lead to healthy competition.
Options- A. None is strong
- B. Only I and II are strong
- C. Only II and III are strong
- D. Only I and III are strong Discuss
- 3. Statement
Should the Government introduce a system of obtaining bond from students for working in India before sanctioning education loan for higher studies?
Arguments
I. No,this is not a workable solution and will obstruct the development of young talent in the country.
II. Yes, this is the only way to ensure use of the talent of our country for the development of the country and not only an individual.
II. No, this step will be too harsh.
Options- A. Only I is strong
- B. Only II is strong
- C. Only I and II are strong
- D. None is strong Discuss
- 4. Statement
Should the government impose restrictions as access to sensitive information to the journalists to avoid the media type?
Arguments
I. Yes, the media creates hype and published distorted information at times.
II. No, journalists should have an access to all the information as media is the best source to expose the malfunction sin the society.
III. Yes, at times is leads to harassment of those who are affected and alleged to be involved in the crisis.
Options- A. All I, II and III are strong
- B. I and II are strong
- C. II and III are storng
- D. Only II is strong Discuss
- 5. Statement
Should government service in rural areas atleast for two years after completion of graduation be made compulsory for the students of medicine.
Arguments
I. Yes, it is everyone's duty to serve the people in rural areas and contribute to their upliftment.
II. No, it cannot be applied only to the medicine students, since anyways they are contributing during their studies and particularly in the period of internship.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 6. Statement
Should the government ban export of all types of foodgrains for the next one year to tide over the unpredicted drought situation in the country?
Arguments
I. Yes, there is no other way to provide food to its citizen during the year.
II. No, the government does not have its jurisdiction over private exporters for banning export.
III. Yes, the Government should not allow the exporters to export foodgrains and procure all the foodgrains held by such exporters and make it available for home consumption.
Options- A. I and II are strong
- B. II and III are strong
- C. I and III are strong
- D. All are strong Discuss
- 7. Statement
Should all those students who failed in one or two subjects in Hsc be allowed to take admission in degree courses and continue their study, subject to their successfully passing in the supplementary examination?
Arguments
I. Yes, this will help the students to complete their education without a break of one year.
II. Yes, this is a forward looking strategy to help the students and motivate them for higher studies.
III. No, such students do not choose to continue their studies without having passed in all the subjects in HSC.
Options- A. Only I is strong
- B. Only II is strong
- C. Only III is strong
- D. Either II or III and I are strong Discuss
- 8. Statement
Should all the students graduating in any discipline desirous of pursuing post-graduation of the subjects of their choice be allowed to enroll in the post- graduate courses?
Arguments
I. Yes, the students are the best judge of their capabilities and there should not be restriction for joining post-graduate courses.
II. No, the students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enroll in post -graduate courses and the students must fulfill such conditions.
III. No, there are not enough institutes offering post- graduate courses which can accommodate all the graduates desirous of seeking post -graduate education of their own choice
Options- A. All are strong
- B. I and II are strong
- C. II and III are strong
- D. I and III are strong Discuss
- 9. Statement
Should 'literacy' be the minimum criterion for becoming a voter in India?
Arguments
I.No, mere literacy is no guarantee of political maturity of an individual.
II. Yes , illiteracy people are less likely to make politically wiser decisions of voting for a right candidate or party.
III.No, voting is the constitutional right of every citizen.
Options- A. None is stong
- B. I and III are strong
- C. III is strong
- D. II and III are strong Discuss
- 10. Statement
Should all the indirect taxes in India be combined into a single tax on all commodities?
Arguments
I. Yes, this will considerably simplify the tax collection mechanism and the cost of collection tax will also reduce.
II. Yes, the manufactures and traders will be benefited by this which in turn will be boost tax collections.
III. No, no other country has adopted such system.
Options- A. None is strong
- B. I and III are strong
- C. Only II is strong
- D. II and III are strong Discuss
Statement and Argument problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: Only III is strong
Explanation:
Arguments I and II do not provide a strong enough reason for putting up a complete ban on registration of new cars because this is highly discriminatory against the new buyers. So, Argument III is strong argument because it opposes the statements with a strong reason.
Correct Answer: None is strong
Explanation:
All arguments stated do not strongly support the statement because if there are few banks in place of several small banks, then security for investor cannot be ensured. Also, it cannot help to consolidate the entire banking industry.
Correct Answer: Only I is strong
Explanation:
Only Argument I holds strong because this is definitely not the solution. Arguments II and III are weak arguments.
Correct Answer: All I, II and III are strong
Explanation:
Argument I is strong because at times media can be responsible for creating hype of a distorted information. Also , Journalists plays an important role in exposing the malfunctioning of the society, so Argument II is also strong. Argument III is strong because it some times leads to harassment of affected person. So, all three statement are strong.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Argument I is weak because it is not true. You cannot sweep 'everyone' with the same brush. Argument II is ambiguous. it first says, it cannot be applied only to the medicine students.' But remaining part of the argument has got nothing to do with this only.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Argument I is weak as it is not true. Argument II is also weak on the same grounds. Argument III is strong as it elaborates on how banning exports would help tackle the drought situation.
Correct Answer: Either II or III and I are strong
Explanation:
Argument I is definitely strong as this will help a student to avoid one year gap that could occur in his studies. Argument II and III are both correct and hold strong but they contradict each other, So only one can be true.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Students should take subject of their interest at graduate level. At post -graduate level only interest is not the factor to take subjects. So, Argument I is not strong but II is strong because at post-graduate level, students must fulfill the essential conditions.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
It cannot be said that is literate person has all round knowledge of politics. So, Argument I is strong. IIIiterate person can easily be misled on various factors but voting is also a constitutional right of every citizen. So, Arguments II and III are also strong.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Argument I and II are strong because a single tax will simplify the tax collection mechanism and manufactures and traders will be benefited by it. What other countries are doing, we should not adopt that blindly. So, Argument III is not strong.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Verbal Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.