Discussion
Home ‣ Verbal Reasoning ‣ Statement and Argument Comments
- Question
- Statement:
University degrees should be completely delinked from the criterion of employment openings.
Arguments:
I. Yes, at present most of the subjects have no practical dimension in the course structure.
II.Yes, huge crowd for conventional education will be curbed and magnitude of 'educated unemployed' would no longer be there in the years to come.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong
- Correct Answer
- if neither I nor II is strong
ExplanationPractical dimension has always been laid with applicative wisdom of a learned person. degrees never had anything to do with that.so, I is not strong.II seems irrelevant because it wants to deal with unemployment problem,not with the compatibility of university education and employment opportunities.
- 1. Statement:
Should the election commission (EC) make it mandatory for political parties to give 33 per cent tickets to women?
Arguments:
I. Yes, the move will ensure larger percentage women's representation in political arena.
II. No, the move will compel the parties to distribute tickets to women for those seats where possibility to win is less.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 2. Statement
Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?
Arguments
I. Yes, it is a rule and should be followed strictly by all.
II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to this discretion.
III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.
IV Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.
Options- A. None is strong
- B. I and III are strong
- C. I and IV are strong
- D. II and IV are strong Discuss
- 3. Statement
Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?
Arguments
I. No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
II. No, each institute should be given freedom to function on its.own.
III. Yes, this will enable to have standardized education for all the students.
IV. Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.
Options- A. None Is strong
- B. I, II and III are strong
- C. I and II are strong
- D. All are strong Discuss
- 4. Statement
Should all the deemed universities be derecognized and attached to any of the Central or state universities in India?
Arguments
I. Yes, many of the these deemed Universities do not conform to the required standards of a full-fledged university and hence, the level of education is compromised with.
II. No, these Deemed Universities have been able to introduce innovative courses suitable to the requirement of various industries as they are free from strict Government controls.
III. Yes many such universities are basically money spinning activities and education takes a backseat in these institutions.
Options- A. I and II are strong
- B. II and III are strong
- C. I and III are strong
- D. None of the above Discuss
- 5. Statement
Should the Government order closure of all educational institutions for a month to avoid fast spreading of the contagious viral infection?
Arguments
I. No, the closure of educational institutions alone is not the solution for curbing the spread of the viral infection.
II. No, students will visit crowded places like malls, markets, play grounds etc in more numbers and spread the disease, as they will have a lot of spare time at their disposal.
III. Yes, young persons are more prone to get affected by the viral infection and hence, they should remain indoors.
Options- A. None is strong
- B. Only I is strong
- C. Only III is strong
- D. I and II are strong Discuss
- 6. Statement:
Should a legislation be enacted to ensure that people elected from a party will have to stay in that outfit?
Arguments:
I.Yes, there is no solution to defection otherwise.
II. No, it will invite frequent election in case no party succeeds to get a majority.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 7. Statement:
Should chief ministers have a say in judicial appointments?
Arguments:
I. Yes, exclusion of the executive completely by vesting the power in the Chief justice of India with or without a collegium of judges will not be in the interest of the public and preservation of the independence of the judiciary.
II. Yes, if Central Government is give primacy in the case of the Chief Justice of India, why will the State Government be devoid of the same power regarding appointment of Chief justice of High Court?
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 8. Statement:
Should there be a legislation to restrict the number of ministers?
Arguments:
I. Yes, in some states defections were resorted to in order to gain a majority because of which the number of Ministers have exceeded the number of MLAs.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 9. Statement:
Should there be a ban on facilitating free train service to the persons taking part in rallies organised by reputed parties?
Argument:
I. Yes, rallies create many problems like road jams, disruption in day -to-day activities etc and create inconvenience for the common man.
II. No, otherwise people will hesitate to participate in any rallies.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 10. Statement:
Should the Cabinet approve changes in the allocation criteria for funds to the states for carrying out the accelerated rural water supply programmer?
Arguments:
I. Yes, We are in a would where most of the things are changing at a fast pace; uses of water have increased; therefore per capital consumption of water has also increased.
II. No. Change in allocation criteria will put a burden on the budget.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong; and Discuss
Statement and Argument problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I; I is a strong argument because it is true that the out come of the move will result as a explained in the argument I. but II is weak because the abuse of a situation is inherent in any move.
Correct Answer: I and IV are strong
Explanation:
Arguments I and IV are strong because the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike should be followed strictly by all. It protects our head which is the most sensitive organ of human body.
Correct Answer: None Is strong
Explanation:
None of the arguments has strong reasons to support or to oppose the given statements. So, none of the arguments is strong.
Correct Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
Only Argument II is strong, Arguments I and III are weak as 'All' cannot be punished for the fault of 'many.'
Correct Answer: Only III is strong
Explanation:
Argument I is weak as it merely tries to evade the issue. Argument II may turn out to be true but it is based on a negative mind set, may be it's mere of an assumption. Hence, II is weak. Argument III gets into the reason and is therefore strong.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
4; I is weak because it lacks substance.defection is already being talked about in the statement.II is not relevant argument.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Only I is strong. II is not strong because State Government can 't be compared with Central Government.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Only I is strong because it will reduce the cases of defection and the wrong way to gain a majority . II is not strong because restriction of the number of ministers does not imply that there wii be less number of ministers than required.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
I is not strong because it is not pinpointing the core issue and stresses on the disadvantage of rally in general. II is weak because it is too simplistic and does not have argumentative substance.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I is strong because it goes into reason. II is a weak argument because it is obsessed with the false notion that change in allocation puts a burden on the budget.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Verbal Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.