Discussion
Home ‣ Verbal Reasoning ‣ Statement and Argument Comments
- Question
- Statement:
Should government keep other oil PSUs out of the HPCL disinvestment.
Arguments:
I. yes, this will keep precious funds of other oil PSUs out of unproductive expenditure.
II. No, these oil units will take keen interest and bid higher then the private units.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong
- Correct Answer
- if only argument II is strong
ExplanationI is weak because it wrongly assumes that if other oil PSUs buy HPCL share, it will be unproductive. II is strong because it will facilitate government in getting more revenue through disinvestment .
- 1. Statement:
Should user charge be increased in sectors like telecom?
Arguments:
I. Yes, revenue earned through hike in user charges will be helpful in improving the quality of services provided by these sector to the consumer.
II. No, hike in user charges will deprive many consumers of the services provided by these sectors.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if neither I nor II is strong
- D. if both I and II are strong Discuss
- 2. Statement:
Should subsidy be given on blended fuel in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this will encourage the use of blended fuel ( an environment-friendly fuel ) as a result of which the burden of import of fuel will reduce and ultimately save the country 's foreign exchange reserves.
II. No, blended fuel is not available in all states of India.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 3. Statement:
Should cricket teams of smaller countries who have no long history in cricket be allowed to play in Word cup cricket matches?
Arguments :
I. Yes, this will help the globalisation of cricket -gentleman 's game .
II. No, this will upset the records established in thought, more challenging situations.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if both I and II are strong Discuss
- 4. Statement:
Should robots replace astronauts in space missions?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this will save the precious life of human beings.
II. No, this will make space mission more expensive.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 5. Statement:
Should medical colleges be allowed to admit students even after the commencement of their session, if the seats remain unfilled?
Arguments:
I. Yes, unfilled seats will weaken the economic condition of the colleges.
II. No, this will hamper the study of the students of the entire batch .
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 6. Statement:
Should cricket players be punished with life ban for having nexus with bookies.
Arguments:
I. No, any such ban will discourage other players too.
II. Yes, events of matchfixing have unnerved the common man .A stringent law like life ban will not only make cricket more dynamic but also restore its old glory as a game of honest persons.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 7. Statement:
Should only reputed NGOs be authorised to distribute the commodities to the public distribution system (PDS)?
Arguments:
I.Yes, the move will be helpful to implement the programme more effectively and will keep a tab on various problems like black marketing of the commodities supplied under PDS,
II. Yes,NGOs have helped government on many occasions.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 8. Statement:
Should vacation of central government employees be reduced?
I. Yes, increase in number of working days will speed up the work done by the central government employees as a result of which people will get service from these employees in reasonable time.
II. Yes, vacation makes the employees lazy and reduces the stamina of employees to work for long hours.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 9. Statement:
Should indian players,who have played for indian on international level, be allowed to work as coach for the the team of other countries?
Arguments:
I. Yes,that experience which does not harm one's nation must be used to benefit others.
II. No,this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team's weaknesses to other teams.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 10. Statement
Should the salary and perquisites of public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?
Arguments
I. Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain competent workforce.
II. No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of private sector.
III. Yes, otherwise the public sector undertaking will not be able to compete with the private sector organization.
Options- A. None is strong
- B. Only III is strong
- C. Only I is strong
- D. I and III are strong Discuss
Statement and Argument problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: if both I and II are strong
Explanation:
I is strong on the ground of quality while II is string or the ground of accessibility .
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I is strong because a positive impact on the burden is desirable and has a great importance in the country 's economy. II is not strong because the question related with subsidy on blended fuel. the issue on which argument II stresses has no substance to negate subsidy on blended fuel
Correct Answer: if both I and II are strong
Explanation:
I is a strong argument because it will make cricket more popular, which is desirable. II is a strong argument because records made by the players in tougher and more challenging situations can not be ignored.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I is strong because men are more important then machines. II is not strong because the argument lacks authenticity.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I is strong because weakness in financial condition will lead to inadequate infrastructure facilities . II is a weak argument. Because the losers will be only those students who join the course after the commencement of the session .
Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong
Explanation:
I is not strong. II is strong because it will give a new impetus to the interest of the common man in cricket.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
only I is strong because it will make the PDS programme more meaningful and purposeful. II is weak because it adds nothing substantial to the statement.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
II is weak argument because it wrongly assumes that vacation makes employees lazy and less hardworking.
I is strong because lesser vacation ensures higher working days. will reduce the work pending.
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
I is strong because fosters sportsman spirit.II is weak argument because the weakness of team is know not only to its former players.
Correct Answer: I and III are strong
Explanation:
Competent work force is desirable. Hence, Argument I is strong. Argument II does not appear to be true for all PSUs. And even it is true, an argument that takes recourse in helplessness seems to fall short on merit. Argument III is strong as competition is desirable.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Verbal Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.