I is weak because it is not desirable .Moreover, is falsely assumes that govt authorities can 't cope with the demand of driving hiences . II is weak because it is not logical. it wrongly assumes that such a move will lead to a spurt in the number of vehicles
I is strong because intimacy of NRIs with Indian soil will be helpful for Indian economy .II is weak argument because a move can 't be restricted only because the move is not giving benefit to all of a kind.
Only I is strong. II is not strong because we do not know whether the existing provisions are sufficient or not .
Both the argument focus on trivial aspects . Hence, both I and II are weak arguments.
I is strong because stringent punishment is a good course of action to put restriction on the number of cases of rapes . II is also strong on ground of impact of the crime on the life of victim .
I is strong because the backlog is a cause for concern.
II is not strong because it is difficult to believe that strike is ''the only meaningful weapon '' to achieve the said objective.
I is strong because it will encourage non-violence and will make the environment conducive for pence. II is also strong because effort from only side will not necessarily usher in desirable result. But the state can 't be both more and less peaceful at the same time. Hence either I or II follows.
I is strong because weakness in financial condition will lead to inadequate infrastructure facilities . II is a weak argument. Because the losers will be only those students who join the course after the commencement of the session .
I is strong because men are more important then machines. II is not strong because the argument lacks authenticity.
I is a strong argument because it will make cricket more popular, which is desirable. II is a strong argument because records made by the players in tougher and more challenging situations can not be ignored.
I is strong because a positive impact on the burden is desirable and has a great importance in the country 's economy. II is not strong because the question related with subsidy on blended fuel. the issue on which argument II stresses has no substance to negate subsidy on blended fuel
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.