Argument I is not strong because correct administrative status or performance may control even big states properly. But argument II has its obvious explanation as the cost is going to increase anyway if we set up new offices,recruit new personnel etc.,
I is strong. in fact, higher education would lose its meaning if it becomes universal, at least in the present scenario where unemployment prevai!s. we rather need to give thrust to vocational education. II is strong. it is true that if the subsidy amount being wasted on higher education is diverted to primary education,we shall be more in tune with development
Strikes are against the professional ethics,alis affect the students adversely
Profession and religion are altogether different.Hence,only Argument I is strong.
One should not become himself a criminal by murdering others so as to wipe out person responsible for problem.
Synonyms do not have the exact meaning of the given word but it is nearest to the meaning of the word.
If an institution has to improve its academic performance,it has to take the good students ignoring the masses.
A is a weak arguments. What is wrong if sex is considered taboo ? The argument fails to go into reasons . B is not strong because it undermines the capacity of sex education itself.
A is strong because prevention of accidents must be given top priority. B is weak because it talks of "major problem "vaguely
A is strong because pollution has become a threat to our environment . B is strong because losses to vehicle-owners can' t be ignored
A is strong because fiscal deficit has gone out of control. B is not strong because as far as portfolios are concerned, they will go on increasing if you subdivide them. And at such a pace, you may end up with a ministry for every tiny aspect.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.