Word 'only' makes Argument II vague but Argument I the example other countries. Hence, neither Argument I nor II holds
Word 'only' makes Argument I vague.Also,Argument II does not hold the statement
Clearly, all the countries in the world facing problem of terrorism.So,Practically India should have military. Hence,Argument I holds.
The constitution of India has laid down the doctrine of 'equality before the law' Also we cannot find the intentions of a person behind committing a crime.Hence, only Argument II holds strong.
Closing down public sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged person out of employment. Hence,only Argument I holds strong.
Person with criminal background cannot stand to serve as the representatives of the common people, so they should not allowed to contest elections .Hence only Argument I hold strong
Neither Argument I nor II holds strong both have lack logic.
Fabulous prices for old master pieces are demanded because of their originality and innovative hard effects.
Synonyms do not have the exact meaning of the given word but it is nearest to the meaning of the word.
One should not become himself a criminal by murdering others so as to wipe out person responsible for problem.
Profession and religion are altogether different.Hence,only Argument I is strong.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.