The constitution of India has laid down the doctrine of 'equality before the law' Also we cannot find the intentions of a person behind committing a crime.Hence, only Argument II holds strong.
Closing down public sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged person out of employment. Hence,only Argument I holds strong.
Person with criminal background cannot stand to serve as the representatives of the common people, so they should not allowed to contest elections .Hence only Argument I hold strong
15 yr old vehicles cause much pollution in comparison to recent ones. As owners of these vehicles need not shift themselves.Hence,only Argument I holds.
The opinion polls may influence the thinking of an individual and thus, divert his mind.Also, blindly imitating a policy followed by other countries holds no relevance.Hence.only Argument I holds.
This determination is done as parents mostly want a boy child.Also people who have a right to know, they should only know about the health development and general well being of the child before its birth. Hence,Argument I holds.
Clearly, all the countries in the world facing problem of terrorism.So,Practically India should have military. Hence,Argument I holds.
Word 'only' makes Argument I vague.Also,Argument II does not hold the statement
Word 'only' makes Argument II vague but Argument I the example other countries. Hence, neither Argument I nor II holds
Neither Argument I nor II holds strong both have lack logic.
Fabulous prices for old master pieces are demanded because of their originality and innovative hard effects.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.