Closing down public sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged person out of employment. Hence,only Argument I holds strong.
Person with criminal background cannot stand to serve as the representatives of the common people, so they should not allowed to contest elections .Hence only Argument I hold strong
15 yr old vehicles cause much pollution in comparison to recent ones. As owners of these vehicles need not shift themselves.Hence,only Argument I holds.
The opinion polls may influence the thinking of an individual and thus, divert his mind.Also, blindly imitating a policy followed by other countries holds no relevance.Hence.only Argument I holds.
This determination is done as parents mostly want a boy child.Also people who have a right to know, they should only know about the health development and general well being of the child before its birth. Hence,Argument I holds.
Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all,these factors ,if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfil the objective of the constitution.Hence both the argument hold strong.
The constitution of India has laid down the doctrine of 'equality before the law' Also we cannot find the intentions of a person behind committing a crime.Hence, only Argument II holds strong.
Clearly, all the countries in the world facing problem of terrorism.So,Practically India should have military. Hence,Argument I holds.
Word 'only' makes Argument I vague.Also,Argument II does not hold the statement
Word 'only' makes Argument II vague but Argument I the example other countries. Hence, neither Argument I nor II holds
Neither Argument I nor II holds strong both have lack logic.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.