Foreign films depict the alien culture but they also help in learning.Hence,both argument are not strong.
Clearly. India seeks to bring different nations on friendly term with each other.Also, internal problem of a nation should not discourage it from strengthening international relations. Hence, only Argument I holds strong.
Restrictions on the diet of people will deny them their basic human right. So, only Argument II holds
We know that, oil is an essential commodity and its prices govern the price of other essential commodities.Also, the common people must be taken care of. Hence, Argument II holds strong.
if we apply the proposed scheme,people will not deposit their money for longer period and thus liquidity with the bank will fall drastically. So, only Argument I holds.
Only Argument II is strong because a common entrance test will brought a uniformity in the standard of students, which is necessary.
For personal gain,doctor can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment. Also,a policy beneficial to common people cannot be 'undemocratic'. So only Argument II holds.
There is more security in joint family as there are other members to help. Also in nuclear families there are lesser persons, so lesser responsibilities and more freedom.Hence, both argument are strong.
Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all,these factors ,if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfil the objective of the constitution.Hence both the argument hold strong.
This determination is done as parents mostly want a boy child.Also people who have a right to know, they should only know about the health development and general well being of the child before its birth. Hence,Argument I holds.
The opinion polls may influence the thinking of an individual and thus, divert his mind.Also, blindly imitating a policy followed by other countries holds no relevance.Hence.only Argument I holds.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.