Arguments I is strong i.e, India should make efforts to harness solar energy to fulfill its energy requirement because most of the energy sources used at present are exhaustible. Arguments II is weak.
Both the arguments are strong because each of the arguments deals with the statement quite logically.
Argument I is strong. Fabulous prices for old master piece are demanded because of their originality and innovative hard efforts.
Arguments I does not establish proper relation with the statement. Argument II may be an opinion and has not been discussed in the given statement. Hence, I and II both are weak.
Arguments I is not the right way. Thus, Argument I s weak Arguments II is strong as upliftment of socially backward classes is necessary.
Argument I is strong but Arguments II is simplistic and hence, it is a weak argument.
Logically, only Arguments I is strong
No, children should not be prevented completely from watching the television because we get vital information regarding education through television and its does not hamper the study of children, if it is watched according to a schedule. So, Argument I is strong, while Argument II is weak.
Argument I is weak because reduction of work load of IT officials is not too desirable a motive. Argument II is strong as reduced tax collection will have a bad impact on state activities.
Clearly, if we form smaller states out of bigger one in India, there will be of greater administrative convenience. Hence Argument I is strong. Also, it may hamper the national integration. So, Argument II also strong. Hence, both arguments are strong.
Only Argument II is strong because a common entrance test will brought a uniformity in the standard of students, which is necessary.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.