Both are weak. There is no relation between the establishment of universities and the achievement of the literacy target. The second argument appear illogical that due to establishment of more universities we shall have highly educated and unemployment youths, Hence, both the arguments are weak.
From option (c),
8 * 8 * 1 * 7 = 8
? 8 ÷ 8 x 1 + 7 = 8
? 8 = 8
Statements
P < Q = R ? S ? T
Conclusions
I. T ? Q (true)
II. R > P (true)
Hence, both conclusions are definitely true.
If we interchanges signs '+' and '÷', then the equation changes into
15 + 9 x 3 - 74 ÷ 2 = 15 + 27 - 37 = 5
Solve all option one by one,
36 + 6 - 3 x 2 = 20
After changing the symbol as per question,
36 ÷ 6 x 3 + 2 = 20
Apply the BODMAS rule,
? 6 x 3 + 2 = 20
? 18 + 2 = 20
? 20 = 20
H ? W ..(i) W < N ...(ii) R = N ...(iii)
Combining these we get H ? W < N = R
Hence R > W and I follows
Again N > W and II follows
And, H < R III follows
4 x 3 x 4 = 48
D ? N ...(i) R = F ...(ii) F > T ...(ii)
From (i) and (ii) D ? R = F or D ? F or F ? D.
Hence either I (F = D ) or II (F > D) follows
From (ii) and (iii) R = F > T or R > T or T < R.
Hence III follows.
M < T ... (i) T > K ...(ii) K = D ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) T > K = D or D < T.
Hence I follow
From (i) and (ii) K and M can't be compared
Hence II does not follow
N < O ? R > T; R < A; B ? T
Check for I:
N < O ? R > T
? No definite relation can be found between N and A.
Check for II:
Apply all option one by one.
? 6 x 4 + 2 = 16 ? 4 + 6 x 2 = 16 ? 4 + 12 = 16
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.