Argument I is strong as improved ambience is desirable. Argument II is strong because segmentation of adult is undesirable.
The luxury hotels are symbols of country's development and a place for staying the affluent foreign tourists. So Argument II is a strong one. Argument I is a weak argument because ban on luxury hotels is not a way to end the international criminals.
It is very clear that encouragement to the young entrepreneurs will open up the fields for setting up of new industries. Therefore, it will help in industrial development. Consequently, more job opportunities will be created. Thus, both the arguments are strong .
Both the arguments refer to the practical consequences of the action mentioned in the statement and hence, are strong.
Argument I is not strong because word 'only' makes the argument weak as it is not the only real and practical solution to improve the level of literacy, Argument II is strong as if described the practical problem which may arise out of the decision of making education free in India.
Clearly, 15 year old vehicles are not Euro-compliant and hence cause much more pollution than the recent ones. So, argument I holds. Argument II is vague since owners of these vehicles need not shift themselves. They might sell off their vehicles and buy new ones - a small price which every citizen can afford for a healthy environment.
Both are strong but both cannot be true at the same time. The sale will either be affected (as I says) or not be affected (as II says). Hence, either is strong.
Argument I is strong as school is the ground where we prepare for the future battles of life. Argument II is strong as examination kill our creativity, turning us all into mere clerks.
Arguments I is weak as it is based on example. Argument II is strong as it is the demand of lakhs of employees it is justified.
Both are weak. There is no relation between the establishment of universities and the achievement of the literacy target. The second argument appear illogical that due to establishment of more universities we shall have highly educated and unemployment youths, Hence, both the arguments are weak.
Private sector is supposed to be more discipline and efficient than the government sector. Hence I is strong II is rubbish.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.