Statement:
Should foreign collaborations in higher education be allowed without proper scrutiny?
Arguments:
I. No, no association should be allowed without proper scrutiny because sometimes these collaboration turn out to be frauds. There are cases where the association promises job securities and other facilities for students but which, in reality, are nothing but a shame.
II. No, our country is already facing the problem of 'brain drain'. Many foreign universities and institutes lure talented and hardworking students to join their courses which subsequently leads to 'brain drain' as they promise jobs in foreign countries.

Second is the sound produced by the first.

All are alloys.

In all other groups of words, numeric component in between the first and second letters is the sum of positions of first and last letters in the alphabet.

In all pairs except (d), first is the founder of second.

Both A and R are true and because of the reason the assertion is true.

Is Sriya and Deepti are part of a team of four, it means that two boys have to be selected. Since Sriya is selected therefore Sood will be definitely selected. Now , the second boy can be either Amit or Gupta. Therefore, the answer cannot be determined.

Both I and II follow because of the tone of the statement.

Now position of Ashwini = (15 + 6)
= 21st from left

Argument I lacks substance and is hence weak. That it is a ''flying coffin'' is evident from the statement itself. II is strong because it makes no sense to ban the aircraft when the responsibility lies somewhere else.

The pattern of given letter series is :-
c b b g
After completing the pattern, we will get complete letter series.
c b b g/ c b b g/ c b b g