Discussion
Home ‣ Verbal Reasoning ‣ Statement and Argument Comments
- Question
- Statement
Should political parties be banned?
Arguments
I. Yes, it is necessary to teach a lesson to the politicians.
II. No, it will lead to an end of democracy.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong
- Correct Answer
- if only Argument II is strong
ExplanationOnly Argument II is strong because ban on political parties will definitely lead to an end of democracy.
- 1. Statement
Should private sector be permitted to operate telephone services?
Arguments
I. Yes, they are operating in advanced western countries.
II. No, it is risky to put them in private hands.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 2. Statement
Should adulteration in food staff be considered serious crime.
Arguments
I. Yes, the stuff may cause ill health and sometimes result in the death of the poor victims.
II. No, the thing that are mixed with food stuff are not really poisonous.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong`
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 3. Statement
Can the young enjoy the old movies?
Arguments
I. Yes, the movies of these days have no proper story.
II. No, the old movies lack the glamour and fastness of modern movies.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 4. Statement
Does president rule in state improve law ans order in the disturbed areas?
Arguments
I. Yes, the Chief Minister does not know how to cope with the deteriorating conditions of law and order.
II. President rule is better then rule by State Government.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 5. Statement
Will the cauveri river water dispute be settled down at last?
Arguments
I. Yes the politicians of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu will come to some satisfactory political settlement.
II. No, both the states have their own interests, hence the dispute will be prolonged.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 6. Statement
Should coal engines be replaced by electric engines in trains?
Arguments
I. Yes, coal engines cause a lot of pollution.
II. No, India does not produce enough electricity to fulfil even the domestic needs.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 7. Statement
Do discussions lead to solutions of disputes?
Arguments
I. Yes, all the pros and cons are weighted in their proper perspectives and the right solutions is reached.
II. No, no one is really convinced.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 8. Statement
Is the verdict of a judge always just and the right one?
Arguments
I. Yes, the judges are very learned and intelligent.
II. No, tricky lawyer and the false evidence often twist the case and mislead the judge.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 9. Statement
Do thin clothes suit people who are over-weight?
Arguments
I. Yes, they cling to wearer making one look less fat.
II. No, in thin clothes bulges become more prominent.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 10. Statement
Is investment of money in insurance policies a wise step?
Arguments
I. Yes, it ensures security and covers risks.
II. No, by the time the policy matures, the value of money falls down considerably?
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
Statement and Argument problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
None of the argument is strong. Argument I is weak because if it is operating successfully in Western Countries, it may not necessarily succeed in India i.e., based on example. Argument II is irrelevant.
Correct Answer: if only Argument I is strong`
Explanation:
Argument I is strong because adulteration may cause ill health and death of poor victims.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Both the arguments are weak.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Both the arguments are weak. Argument I is weak as it is totally hypothetical. Argument II is irrelevant.
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
None of the argument is strong because both the argument are based on hypothetical facts.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Both the arguments are logical and directly related to the statement and hence, are strong arguments.
Correct Answer: if only Argument I is strong
Explanation:
Argument I is strong as it provides a clear logic and is directly related to statement. Argument II is without logic and hence, is a weak argument.
Correct Answer: if only Argument II is strong
Explanation:
Verdict of judge depends on evidences and pleading of advocate, hence Argument I is weak. Argument II is strong as false evidence can mislead the judge.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Both the argument are strong.
Correct Answer: if only Argument I is strong
Explanation:
Argument I is strong because insurance is meant to cover the risk and promotes savings. Argument II lacks clear logic.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Verbal Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.