First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Some shops are rooms. ? All rooms are kitchens.
I + A ? I-type of Conclusion "Some shops are kitchens."
This is the Conclusion II.
Conclusion III is the Converse of the first Premise.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
All teachers are actors. ? Some actors are women.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion III is the Converse of the second Premise.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A ? type).
Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I ? type).
All Aeroplanes are trains. ? Some trains are chairs.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion III is the Converse of the second Premise.
Conclusion IV is the Converse of the first Premise.
Conclusion I clearly follows from the first statement. Some doctors are creative persons are learned people. Therefore, some doctors are learned people. Its converse would be some learned people are doctors. Thus, both the conclusions follow.
All scientists working in America are talented.
Some scientists working in America are Indians.
Therefore, some talented Indian scientists have migrated to America.
Thus, some Indian scientists are talented.
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I?type).
No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
All books are novels. ? Some novels are poems.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion II is the Converse of the second Premise.
First Premise is Particular Affirmative ( ? type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A ? type).
Some monkeys are dogs. ? All dogs are cats.
I + A ? I?type of Conclusion "Some monkeys are cats."
This is Conclusion I.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A?type).
Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I?type).
Some grapes are fruits. ? All fruits are leaves.
I + A ? I?type of Conclusion "Some grapes are leaves."
Conclusion I is the Converse of it.
First Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Hari is a man. ? No man is a monkey.
A + E ?E ? type of Conclusion "Hari is not a monkey".
This is Conclusion I.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
All books are trees. ? All trees are lions.
A + A ? A-type of Conclusion "All books are lions".
This is Conclusion I. Conclusion IV is the Converse of it.
Therefore, Conclusion I and Conclusion IV follow.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.