Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type). No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
The first Premise is Universal Affirmative (A?type).
The second and the third Premises are Particular Affirmative (I?type).
All men are bachelors. ? Some bachelors are teachers.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion II is the Converse of the third Premise.
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
Conclusion II is Converse of the first statement.
Conclusion IV is Converse of the second statement.
Conclusions I and III form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either I or III follows.
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type). No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
Conclusion I is the Converse of the second Premise.
Conclusion II is the converse of the first Premise.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
All benches are tables. ? No table is chair
A + E ? E-type of Conclusion "No bench is chair."
This is Conclusion IV.
No mobile is a watch. ? All watches are calculators.
E + A ? O1 -type of Conclusion. "Some calculators are not mobiles".
Conclusions I and II form Complementary Pair, Therefore, either Conclusion I or Conclusion II follows.
The first and second Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
The third Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Some beautifuls are honest. ? All honest are sensitives.
I + A ? I-type of Conclusion "Some beautifuls are sensitives."
Conclusion 1 is Converse of it.
The first Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type)
The second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
All pens are pencils. ? No pencil is an eraser.
A + E ? E-type of Conclusion "No pen is an eraser".
This is Conclusion II.
Conclusion I is the Converse
First and second Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
Third Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Some rivers are deserts. All deserts are roads.
I + A ? I-type of Conclusion "Some rivers are roads."
Conclusion I is Converse of it.
Some students are intelligent, i.e., all students are not intelligents. So, Ankita may or may not be intelligent.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
All men are employed. ? No employees are professionals.
A + E ? E-type of Conclusion. ''No man is professional.''
This is Conclusion II.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.