No mobile is a watch. ? All watches are calculators.
E + A ? O1 -type of Conclusion. "Some calculators are not mobiles".
Conclusions I and II form Complementary Pair, Therefore, either Conclusion I or Conclusion II follows.
(i) All peacocks are lions ? Universal Affirmative (A-type).
(ii) Some tigers are peacocks ? Particular Affirmative (I-type).
(iii) No tiger is a lion ? Universal Negative (E-type).
(iv) Some tigers are not lions ? Particular Negative (O-type).
Some tigers are peacocks. ? All peacocks are lions.
I + A ? I-type of Conclusion. "Some tigers are lions".
This is Conclusion III.
The given statement is Universal Negative (E-type).
Conclusion II is Converse of it.
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
All doctors are angels. ? Some angels are human creatures.
A + I = No Conclusion
Only Conclusion I follows :
Some who bark are dogs.
All dogs bite.
It means those dogs who do not bark, also bite.
Some is a part of All. Therefore, conclusion I follows. Since all students like excursion, therefore, Conclusion II also follows .
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
All benches are tables. ? No table is chair
A + E ? E-type of Conclusion "No bench is chair."
This is Conclusion IV.
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type). No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
Conclusion I is the Converse of the second Premise.
Conclusion II is the converse of the first Premise.
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
Conclusion II is Converse of the first statement.
Conclusion IV is Converse of the second statement.
Conclusions I and III form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either I or III follows.
The first Premise is Universal Affirmative (A?type).
The second and the third Premises are Particular Affirmative (I?type).
All men are bachelors. ? Some bachelors are teachers.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion II is the Converse of the third Premise.
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type). No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.