All the singers are fat and Ankit is a singer. So, Ankit is fat.
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
All centuries are decades. ? Some decades are years.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion II is Converse of the first Premise.
Conclusions I and III form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either I or III follows.
(i) All apples are bananas ? Universal Affirmative (A-type).
(ii) Some apples are sweet ? Particular Affirmative (I-type).
(iii) No apple is banana ? Universal Negative (E-type)
(iv) Some apples are not bananas ? Particular Negative (O-type)
All apples are bananas. ? All bananas are sweet.
A + A ? A ? type of Conclusion "All apples are sweet."
Conclusion I is the Implication of it.
Conclusion II is Converse of the first Premise.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative and the second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
All students are boys. ? No boy is dull.
A + E ? E?type of Conclusion "No student is dull"
This is conclusion II.
All buses are houses. ? Some houses are lakes.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion III is Converse of the second Premise.
Conclusion IV is Converse of the first Premise.
The first Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
The second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
Most players are men. ? Some man are singers.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion I is Converse of the second statement.
All animals (without exception) are four?footed.
Dog has two legs. Therefore dog is not an animal.
Thus, only Conclusion I follows.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A?type).
Second Premise is Universal Negative (E?type).
All mangoes are golden in colour. It implies that all mangoes without an exception are golden in colour.
No golden coloured things are cheap.
Thus, Conclusion II follows.
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I?type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A?type).
All insects are ants. ? Some ants are flies.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion II is the Converse of the second Premise.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
All peacocks are crows. ? All crows are birds.
A + A ? A-type of Conclusion "All peacocks are birds."
This is Conclusion I.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A?type).
All squares are rectangles. ? All rectangles are polygons.
A + A ? A?type of Conclusion "All squares are polygons."
Thus, square is rectangle (given) and square is polygon (derived).
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.