Clearly, all monkeys cannot sign.
All philosophers without exception are men. So no woman can be philosopher.
Both the premises are Universal Affirmative. We can align the premises by changing their order. Thus,
X is a lady professor. ? All University professors have a doctorate degree.
We know that,
A + A ? A - type conclusion. Thus our derived conclusion would be "X has a doctorate degree".
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I ? type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A ? type).
All doctors are social workers. ? Some social workers are politicians.
A + I ? No Conclusion.
Statement I is Particular Affirmative (I-type)
Statement II is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Horse is a bird. ? Some birds are clouds.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion I is Converse of the Statement I.
First Premise in Universal Affirmative (A - type).
Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I - type).
All books are novels. ? Some novels are poems.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion II is Converse of the second Premise.
First Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
No cow is chair. ? All chairs are tables.
E + A ? O1 ? type of Conclusion "Some tables are not cows."
Conclusion I is Converse of the second Premise. Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
Conclusions II and IV form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either Conclusion II or IV follows. Thus, Conclusion I and Conclusion II or IV follow.
There is no such options.
First Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
We can align the Premises by Converting the first Premise and changing their order. Thus,
All women are intelligent. ? No intelligent is a man .
we know that,
A + E ?E-type Conclusion Thus our derived Conclusion would be:
"No woman is a man"
This is the Conclusion II. Conclusion I is the Converse of this Conclusion.
Therefore, both the Conclusions I and II follow.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A?type).
All carts are cars. ? All cars are trains.
A + A ? A-type of Conclusion
"All carts are trains."
This is Conclusion I.
We can align the premises by changing their order:
Some citizens are solidiers. ? All solidiers are men.
We know that
I + A ? I type conclusion Thus, our derived conclusion would be:
"Some citizens are men".
This is conclusion on I.
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type)
Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Some shoes are white. ? All white are blue.
I + A ? I-type of Conclusion "Some shoes are blue."
This is Conclusion II.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.