First premise is Particular Affirmative (I?type).
Second premise is Universal Affirmative (I-type).
Both the premises are already aligned. Thus,
Some doctors are teachers ? All teachers are counsellors.
We know that, I + A ? I-type conclusion.
Therefor, our derived conclusion would be:
"Some doctors are counsellors". Thus, only conclusion II follows.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type). We can align the Premises by taking converse of any of the premises.
Some tall men are basketball players ? All basketball players are athletes.
I + A ?I - type of conclusion "Some tall men are athletes".
The first premise is particular Affirmative (I- Type). The second premise is Universal Affirmative (A-Type).
We can align the premises by converting the first premise and changing their order. Thus,
X is poor ? Some poors are peons have a doctorate degree.
We know that,
A + I = No conclusion.
All Majors are captains.
All Majors are Lieutenants.
All Majors are Soldiers.
(This is Conclusion III )
All captains are Soldiers.
(This is Conclusion IV ).
All Lieutenants are Soldiers.
All Painters are Soldiers.
No Painter is Captain.
All professors are learned and learned people are always gentle. So, all professors are gentle persons. It means the Inference is true.
Statement I consists of two Particular Affirmative (I-type) Premises.
Statement II consists of two Universal Affirmative (A-type) Premises.
Some locks are numbers. ? All numbers are letters.
I + A ? I-type of Conclusion "Some locks are letters".
This is Conclusion II.
All numbers are letters. ? All letters are words.
A + A ? A-type of Conclusion "All numbers are words".
Conclusion I is Converse of it.
Some women are politicians. ? All politicians are intelligents.
We know that,
I + A ?I?type Conclusion Thus, our derived Conclusion would be: "Some women are intelligent".
Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
Conclusions I and III form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either Conclusion I or III follows. Considering the given Options we can select option (4) as the answer.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Both the Premises are already aligned.
All girls are proud ? All proud will be humiliated one day
We know that,
A + A ? A ? type Conclusion Therefore, our derived Conclusion would be:
"All girls will be humiliated one day".
Conclusion II is the converse of the derived Conclusion. Thus, both the Conclusions follow.
Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
All men are women. ? All women are crazy.
A + A ? A ? type of Conclusion
"All men are crazy".
This is Conclusion I. Conclusion III is the Converse of it.
Conclusion IV is the Converse of Statement Q.
We can align the premises by converting the second premise.
All Americans are English speaking. ? No English speakers are Eskimos.
We know that,
A + E ? E type conclusion Thus, our derived conclusion would be:
"No Americans are Eskimos."
Conclusion I is the converse of the derived conclusion.
Conclusion II is the converse of second premise.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.