According to the question,
P was more effective than Q.
1. P > Q.
The effectiveness of R was less than that of S.
2. S > R.
T was the least effective brand tested.
3. T is least effective.
Q and R were equally effective.
4. Q = R.
The effectiveness of S was greater than that of Q.
5. S > Q.
from 1 and 5 ,
6. S/P > Q .
from 6 and 4 ,
7. S/P > Q = R .
from 7 and 3 ,
? S/P > Q = R > T
R was less effective than p.
The Multiples of 18 are 18, 36, 54, 72, 90, 108, 126, ....
None focuses on the real reason of unemployability.
Only Course of action I can follow as public awareness programme should be expanded immediately.
Both courses of action are suitable for pursuing.
Courses of action I would be a extreme step. Courses of action II is not within the Government's preview. Courses of action III is advisable when there is retrenchment on such a large scale.
To avoid such in mishappening, deploying police constables can be of help. Also, if people go in groups, then such incidents be avoid.
Going for I is an extreme action and should be resorted to only when the students fail to behave themselves after repeated warnings like the one given in II.
Action I and III will create another problems action II is the effective way to reduce the problem.
We should remember that the culprits are mere students. Going for II instead of I would make sense only if it is a repeated act.
Both statements can help the young pepole to acquire their responsibility.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.