Coding of letters is based on the structure of the word. Logic of coding is very simple. Observe the word and the codes. It gives us following information:
If the word consists of four letters,
(i) and consonants occupy places at extreme ends only, then those consonants are replaced by [5] while vowels are replaced by either [20] (if both the vowels are same) or [15] (if both the vowels are different).
(ii) and the vowels occupy the second and the fourth places only then those vowels are replaced by [25], while the consonants are replaced by [5].
(iii) and the vowels occupy the first and third places only then those vowels are replaced by [30], while the consonants are replaced by [5].
If the word consists of three letters,
(i) and the vowels occupy places at extreme ends only then those vowels are replaced by [0], while the consonant is replaced by [5].
(ii) and the consonants occupy places at extreme ends only then those consonants are replaced by [5], while the vowel is replaced by [10].
Thus, in each and every case consonants are coded as [5] but numeric value assigned to vowels varies according to the position of vowels in a particular word.
The given statement can be shown by the following diagram :
II says about the need and outcome of the initiative. Hence, II is strong. But I does not say how the grievances of the people will enhance.
Latter is the Parliament of the country represented by former.
Any private services can't be banned only because there are charges against manipulation which can be rectified by legal actions. Hence I weak. II is also weak because of the word 'always'.
Income on the 2nd day = Rs. (1x2) = Rs. 21.
Income on the 3rd day = Rs. (21 x 2) = Rs. 22 and so on. Thus, Income on the rath day = Rs. 2n-1.
Therefore Income on the 10th day = Rs. 29.
Therefore, D's house is in the South-East direction of A.
Probodh wrote the second letter to his mother only when he did not receive the reply from his mother. This fact implies that his mother promptly sends reply to his letters. Hence, only Assumption III is implicit.
'Soldier' is a part of 'Army' and similarly 'Player' is a part of 'Team'.
I is true and the new entity will give a new shape to the performance of the Indian Railways. Hence, I is strong. II is not strong because the argument rembles into concerns other than corporatisation.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.