In all other pairs, second is a collective group of the first.
Both I and II are strong. I is strong because in absence of such permission how will those students continue their studies whose financial situation is not strong. II is also strong because it make one confident and adept.
Why was the need felt make the change ? There was certainly something dissatisfactory. Hence I is the assumption behind it. II is obvious.
Both I and II are invalid because they lack proper connectivity with the given statement.
I is strong because a doctor may have to take certain risks to save the the patient's life. II is strong because negligence should not deprive the patients of their legitimate rights.
Except option (c) all are mammal whereas scarab is an insect.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.