Seed 9 will play with seed, 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, and 15 without an upset seed 9 can with seed 11, 13, and 15, for minimum number of upset let seed 1 won all the matches and seed 9 won against seed 3 and 5, in that case number of wins of seed 3 and 9 is 5 but with tie breaker rule seed 9 will advance to the next stage.
Only Assumption I follows.
Q is in South-East of R.
As you are diabetic, you would not eat then because it will lead to harmful effects in the long run.
A is a doctor.
Southwest
The journey was started from the South.
All are terms related to quantitative measurement.
I-type statements can't be combined no conclusion follow by combined But II and III make a complementary I-E pair, Hence either I or III follows.
It may be concluded from the statement that since parents want a perfect development of their children through good schooling, therefore they are prepared to pay any price for a good education but the statement does not give sense of the parents being very well off. Hence, only Conclusion II follows.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.