According to question , we can say that
P, Q, R, S, T, V and W are sitting in a straight line facing north. Each one of them lives on a different floor in the same building which is numbered from one to seven. Q sits fourth to the left of the person living on the 6th floor. W lives on the 3rd floor. The person living on the 1st floor sits third to right of S. S is not an immediate neighbor of W. Only one person lives between T and the person who lives on the 2nd floor.
Clearly , 2nd floor is required answer .
Why does the person gives an advice to provide vocational training to women in work ? There must be a positive and constructive role of the training. Hence I is implicit. II is also implicit. Otherwise the training will be useless.
In December, the Sun shines directly over the southern hemisphere making the south warm and the north cold.
I is not an assumption. It is an inference being drawn out of the "strange thing". But assumption II is implicit. It is this departure from the usual that makes "last night" strange.
The correct reason is that the Constitution does not discriminate between citizens of the country.
104 :78 = 104/26 : 78/26
=4 : 3
64 : 48 = 64/16 : 48/16
= 4 :3
80 : 60 = 80/20 : 60/20
= 4 : 3
But, 96 :80 = 96/16 : 80/16
= 6 : 5
The odd is 96 : 80 because its ratio is 6 : 5 but rest of ratio is 4 : 3.
Political Science, History and Philosophy are the subjects related with humanity while physics is a subject of science.
Both the argument are strong.
Verdict of judge depends on evidences and pleading of advocate, hence Argument I is weak. Argument II is strong as false evidence can mislead the judge.
'Sin ' is related to 'Crime' in the same way 'Morality' is related to 'Legality'.
I is implicit because of the cause-effect relationship. II is also implicit because a thing cannot happen unless it is possible.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.