Meaningful order of words:
(d) Tree ? (b) Branch ? (a) Leaves ? (c) Flower ? (e) Fruit
Given, 40* 2* 4 * 3 * 8
Let us check all the options one by one.
From option (a), putting the signs in given equation, we get
40 + 2 - 4 ÷ 3
= 8 ? 42 - 4/3 = 8
? 126 - 4 = 24 ? 122 = 24
? L H S ? R H S
So, option (a) is incorrect.
From option (b), putting the signs in given equation, we get
40 ÷ 2 + 4 = 3 x 8
? 20 + 4 = 24 ? 24 = 24
LHS = RHS
Hence, option (b) is correct and there is no need to check remaining options.
Both I and II are weak arguments because the supporting facts to stress 'yes' or 'no' are not up to the mark. They do not concentrate upon the real points in the question.
It is necessary for the Government to follow stringent norms for granting permission to the management institutes. For the students too, it is necessary to examine the market value of the degree while talking admissions. But courses of action III is not related to the statement. Hence, Courses of action I and II are appropriate.
The given statement does not tell anything about life. it only tells about problems and the way to escape from them. Hence, Conclusion II follows.
Meaningful order of words :
(e) Monsoon ? (c) Clouds ? (b) Rain ? (d) River ? (a) Ocean
Both I and II are strong . Both I and II will help in ensuring smooth functioning of the law-and -order situation.
I is implicit here. That is why the speaker is talking about another way of living when the environment has been polluted. II can't be assumed from the statement.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
All frogs are tortoises. ? No tortoise is a crocodile.
A + E ? E-type of Conclusion "No frog is a crocodile".
This is Conclusion II.
Conclusion I is Converse of this Conclusion.
White-collar crimes can be in the private sector also.
Only II and III follow
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.