J ? N ...(i) K ? N ...(ii) T > K ...(iii)
Combining these we get T > K ? N ? J
Hence J < T and I follows. Also T > N and II follows.
Beside N ? J and III follows
B = D ...(i) D ? H ...(ii) H > F ...(iii)
D and F can't be compared from (i) and (ii). And from the same reason, if we bear (i) an mind. B and F can't be compared. Hence none follows.
D > K ...(i) K ? R ...(ii) R = M ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) M ? K ...(iv)
Hence either I (M = K) or III (M > K) follow. But M and T can't be compared from (i) and (iv).
Hence II does not follow.
V ? M ...(i) A > M ...(ii) R ? V ...(iii)
These lead us to no relationship by combination.
L ? P.....(i) P < V ...(ii) V > D ...(iii)
Combining (i) and (ii)
we get L ? P < V or L < W ...(iv) L and D can't be compared
Hence II does not follows
V ? W ...(i) W = H ...(ii) H ? I ...(iii)
From (i) and (ii) W = H ? I or W ? I ...(iv)
Hence I ? W and II follows But V and I can't be compared From (iii) and (iv)
Hence I does not follows.
M < R ...(i) R ? T ...(ii) T = N ...(iii)
Combining these we get M < R ? T = N
Hence N ? R
Which means either I (N = R) or II (N > R) follows.
Again N > M. Hence III follows
M ? R ...(i) R < T ...(ii) T ? K ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) M ? R < T or T > M
Hence I follows
From (ii) and (iii) R and K can't be compared. Hence II does not follow
W ? V ..(i) V = Z ...(ii) Z ? D ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) V = Z ? D or D ? V
Hence I follows.
From (i) and (ii) W ? V = Z or W ? Z
Hence II follows.
B > T ...(i) T < H ...(ii) H = M ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) T < H = M or M > I
Hence I follow
From (i) and (ii) B and H can't be compared. Hence II does not follow
J > D ...(i) D = N ...(ii) N ? F ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) D = N ? F or F ? D ...(iv)
Hence II follows.
From (i) and (iv) R and (iv) J and F can't be compared.
Hence I does not follow.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.