During a system study, analysts draw flowcharts using what type of symbols to ensure clarity, consistency, and industry-standard meaning?

Introduction / Context:
Flowcharting is a time-tested way to visualize processes. To prevent confusion and make diagrams universally readable, analysts rely on standardized flowchart symbols (such as terminator, process, decision, data, and connector) with agreed-upon semantics. Using specific, standard symbols ensures that teams interpret the diagram the same way.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• We want clarity and consistent interpretation during system study.
• Readers may come from different teams and backgrounds.
• Symbols should be widely recognized and unambiguous.

Concept / Approach:
Specific symbols are defined in common standards and textbooks: ovals for start/end, rectangles for processes, diamonds for decisions, parallelograms for input/output, and arrows for flow direction. Adhering to these conventions reduces onboarding time and avoids misinterpretation that could propagate into design mistakes or testing gaps.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Compare a standardized flowchart to one drawn with ad hoc shapes; reviewers spend less time deciphering symbols and more time checking the actual logic when standards are used.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Mixing notations on the same page, omitting decision outcomes on diamond branches, and failing to label connectors degrade readability.

Final Answer:
Specific symbols (standardized shapes and connectors).