Discussion
Home ‣ Logical Reasoning ‣ Statement and Argument Comments
- Question
Statement: Should the council of ministers once appointed be kept the same for the entire period intervening two elections?
Arguments:
- No. Shuffling of ministers and portfolios is a healthy democratic process.
- Yes. The ministers do not get a hold on their portfolio unless they are kept for a longer duration.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Either I or II is strong
- D. Neither I nor II is strong
- E. Both I and II are strong
- Correct Answer
- Neither I nor II is strong
ExplanationShuffling of Cabinet ministers is just not a regular process, but a step to ensure proper working and implementation of schemes and avoid corruption. So, none of the arguments holds strong. - 1. Statement: Should words like 'Smoking is injurious to health essentially appear on cigarette packs?
Arguments:
- Yes. It is a sort of brainwash to make the smokers realize that they are inhaling poisonous stuff.
- No. It hampers the enjoyment of smoking.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Either I or II is strong
- D. Neither I nor II is strong
- E. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 2. Statement: Should India support all the international policies of United States of America?
Arguments:
- No. Many other powerful countries do not support the same.
- Yes. This is the only way to gain access to USA developmental funds.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Either I or II is strong
- D. Neither I nor II is strong
- E. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 3. Statement: Should public holidays be declared on demise of important national leaders?
Arguments:
- No. Such unscheduled holidays hamper national progress.
- Yes. People would like to pay their homage to the departed soul.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Either I or II is strong
- D. Neither I nor II is strong
- E. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 4. Statement: Should octroi be abolished?
Arguments:
- Yes. It will eliminate an important source of corruption.
- No. It will adversely affect government revenues.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Either I or II is strong
- D. Neither I nor II is strong
- E. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 5. Statement: Should there be reservation of seats and posts on communal basis?
Arguments:
- Yes. It will check most of the inter-communal biases.
- No, ours is a secular state.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Either I or II is strong
- D. Neither I nor II is strong
- E. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 6. Statement: Should people with educational qualification higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?
Arguments:
- No. It will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
- Yes. It creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
- No. This goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
- Yes. This will increase productivity.
Options- A. Only I and III are strong
- B. All are strong
- C. Only II and IV are strong
- D. Only III is strong
- E. None of these Discuss
- 7. Statement: Should India go in for computerization in all possible sectors?
Arguments:
- Yes. It will bring efficiency and accuracy in the work.
- No. It will be an injustice to the monumental human resources which are at present underutilized.
- No. Computerization demands a lot of money. We should not waste money on it.
- Yes. When advanced countries are introducing computers in every field, how can India afford to lag behind?
Options- A. Only I is strong
- B. Only I and II are strong
- C. Only I and III are strong
- D. Only II and III are strong
- E. All are strong Discuss
- 8. Statement: Should all the school teachers be debarred from giving private tuitions?
Arguments:
- No. The needy students will be deprived of the expertise of these teachers.
- Yes. This is an injustice to the unemployed educated people who can earn their living by giving tuitions.
- Yes. Only then the quality of teaching in schools will improve.
- Yes. Now salary of these teachers is reasonable.
Options- A. Only I and III are strong
- B. Only I, II and III are strong
- C. Only III and IV are strong
- D. Only II, III and IV are strong
- E. None of these Discuss
- 9. Statement: Should education be made compulsory for all children up to the age of 14?
Arguments:
- Yes. This will help to eradicate the system of forced employment of these children.
- Yes. This is an effective way to make the entire population educated.
- No. We do not have adequate infrastructure to educate the entire population.
- Yes. This would increase the standard of living.
Options- A. All are strong
- B. Only I, II and III are strong
- C. Only I, II and IV are strong
- D. Only II is strong
- E. Only II and III are strong Discuss
- 10. Statement: Should trade unions be banned completely?
Arguments:
- Yes. Workers can concentrate on production.
- No. This is the only way through which employees can put their demands before the management.
- Yes. Employees get their illegal demands fulfilled through these unions.
- No. Trade unions are not banned in other economically advanced countries.
Options- A. Only I is strong
- B. Only II is strong
- C. Only I and II are strong
- D. Only I, II and III are strong
- E. None of these Discuss
Statement and Argument problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: Only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Clearly, such words on cigarette packs would warn the smokers beforehand of its adverse effects. So, argument I holds strong. However, smoking is a bad habit with long-term health hazards and is no means of enjoyment. So, argument II is vague.
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Our country cannot support USA's policies blindly without analysis, just to gain monetary help. Also, we should not withdraw our support without considering the policies, just because some other nations have done so. So, none of the arguments holds strong.
Correct Answer: Only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Clearly, unscheduled and untimely holidays would naturally cause the work to suffer. So, argument I holds strong. Also, a holiday is not necessary to pay homage to someone. So, argument II is vague.
Correct Answer: Both I and II are strong
Explanation:
'Octroi' is a custom duty. If octroi is abolished, the practice of bringing in things from foreign countries illegally will be abolished. So, argument I holds strong. Also, if octroi is abolished, the income to the government in the way of the duty paid shall be diminished. So, argument II also holds strong.
Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong
Explanation:
Clearly, reservations on communal basis will increase inter-communal biases. So, argument I is vague. Also it will be against the secular policy, according to which no communal group is given preference over the others. So, only argument II holds.
Correct Answer: Only III is strong
Explanation:
The issue discussed in the statement is nowhere related to increase in unemployment, as the number of vacancies filled in will remain the same. Also, in a working place, it is the performance of the individual that matters and that makes him more or less wanted, and not his educational qualifications. So, neither I nor II holds strong. Besides, the needs of a job are laid down in the desired qualifications for the job. So, recruitment of more qualified people cannot augment productivity. Thus, IV also does not hold strong. However, it is the right of an individual to get the post for which he fulfils the eligibility criteria, whatever be his extra merits. Hence, argument III holds strong.
Correct Answer: Only I is strong
Explanation:
Clearly, the need of today is to put to better use the underutilized human resources. Computers with better and speedy efficiency can accomplish this. So, argument I holds, while II does not. Computerization is a much beneficial project and investment in it is not at all a waste. So, III is not strong. Further, development in a new field is not a matter of merely following up other countries. So, IV also does not hold strong.
Correct Answer: None of these
Explanation:
Only III is strong. The lure of earning private tuitions reduces the efforts and devotion of the teachers towards the students in schools. So, if tuitions are banned, students can benefit from their teachers' knowledge in the school itself. So, argument III holds strong while I does not. However, a person cannot be barred from earning more just because he already has a good salary. So, argument IV is vague. Further, the unemployed people thriving on tuitions can survive with the school teachers holding tuitions too, if they are capable enough to guide the students well. So, argument II also does not hold strong.
Correct Answer: Only II is strong
Explanation:
Clearly, today's children are to make up future citizens of the country and so it is absolutely essential to make them learned, more responsible, more innovative and self-dependent by imparting them education. So, argument II holds strong while I and IV do not. Besides, the goal of literacy cannot be denied for want of infrastructure. So, argument III also does not hold.
Correct Answer: Only II is strong
Explanation:
Clearly, trade unions provide a common platform for the workers to voice their demands and protests and thus ensure that they are not subdued or exploited. So, argument II holds strong, while I and III do not. Besides, the idea of imitation of other countries in the implementation of a certain policy holds no relevance. So, argument IV also does not hold strong.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Logical Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.