Statement: Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states?

Arguments:

1. No. It is against the policy of overall development of the country.
2. Yes. A large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It would lead to higher production.
2. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.

Arguments:

1. Yes. This is an important step to generate employment opportunities.
2. No. This will affect the quality of education due to lack of uniformity in syllabus.

Arguments:

1. No. The private sector entities are hot equipped to handle such projects.
2. Yes. Such projects are handled by private sector in the developed countries.

Arguments:

1. No. Persons below the age of 18 do not attain both physical and mental maturity to shoulder such burden.
2. Yes. This will help the country develop its armed forces which will serve the country for a longer time.

Arguments:

1. Yes. This will bring in some sense of seriousness among the students and will improve the quality.
2. No. This will force the meritorious poor students to stay away from post-graduate courses.

Arguments:

1. Yes. This is the only way to make the oil companies commercially viable.
2. No. This will put additional burden on the retail prices of essential commodities and will cause a lot of hardships to the masses.

Arguments:

1. Yes. This is the only way to enhance performance of the students.
2. No. This will severely affect acquiring knowledge for want of good text books in vernacular medium.

Arguments:

1. No. People will refrain from keeping money for longer duration resulting into reduction of liquidity level of banks.
2. Yes. This will be much simple for the common people and they may be encouraged to keep more money in banks.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Variety of news only confuses people.
2. No. Controlled news loses credibility.

Arguments:

1. Yes, Colour television is a luxury item and only rich people buy them.
2. No, Televisions are bought by the poor too.