Statements: Company X has a record of manufacturing cameras of quality and the latest design so that you do not spoil even a single shot irrespective of the weather conditions.
Conclusions:
No other company except X is reputed in the camera industry.
Anyone can take an acceptable shot with camera X.
Options
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
Correct Answer
Only conclusion II follows
Explanation
Clearly, the statement talks of Company X only and no other company. So, I does not follow. Also, it is mentioned that one can take a good shot even in bad weather conditions with a camera of Company X. So, II follows.
Statement and Conclusion problems
Search Results
1. Statements: I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance.
Conclusions:
Writer's knowledge is very poor.
The world of knowledge is too vast to be explored by a single person.
The statement is a symbolic one and only II correctly explains it.
2. Statements: The President of XYZ Party indicated that 25 independent Members of Legislative Assembly (MLA) are seriously considering various options of joining some political party. But in any case all of them collectively will join one party only.
Conclusions:
The 25 independent MLAs will join XYZ party in a short period of time.
The 25 independent MLAs will join some other political party in a short period of time.
It is mentioned in the statement that India's economy depends mainly on forests. This means that forests should be preserved. So, I follows. But, that only preservation of forests can improve the economy, cannot be said. So, II does not follow.
7. Statements: All branches are flowers. All flowers are leaves.
Since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'All branches are leaves'. Thus, I follows. IV is the converse of this conclusion and so it also holds.
8. Statements: Some bags are pockets. No pocket is a pouch.
Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, II follows. III is the converse of the first premise and thus it also holds.
9. Statements: All aeroplanes are trains. Some trains are chairs.
Since the middle term 'trains' is not distributed even once in the/premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, III is the converse of the second premise while IV is the converse of the first premise. So, both of them hold.
10. Statements: All politicians are honest. All honest are fair.
Clearly, it follows that 'All politicians are fair'. I is the converse of the first premise, while III is the converse of the above conclusion. So, both I and III hold.