Statement: Should high chimneys be installed in industries?

Arguments:

1. Yes. It reduces pollution at ground level.
2. No. It increases pollution in upper atmosphere.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It will create job opportunities.
2. No. It will further add to the pollution of the city.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Generally, people above the age of 65 lose their dynamism and will power.
2. No. The life span is so increased that people remain physically and mentally active even up to the age of 80.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It will mean taking employment at an early date.
2. No. It will mean lack of depth of knowledge.

Arguments:

1. Yes. They must serve the motherland first and forget about discoveries, honours, facilities and all.
2. No. We have enough talent; let them stay where they want.

Arguments:

1. Yes. The young students should not be burdened with such examinations which hampers their natural growth.
2. No. The students will not study seriously as they will get automatic promotion to the next class and this will affect them in future.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Nothing can be achieved without proper planning.
2. No. Too much time, money and energy is wasted on planning.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It will save a lot of paper which is in short supply.
2. No. It is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Colleges are in a better position to assess the student's performance and therefore the degrees will be more valid.
2. No. It is Utopian to think that there will not be nepotism and corruption in awarding degrees by colleges.

Arguments:

1. Yes. The prestigious people do not commit crime intentionally.
2. No. It is our policy that everybody is equal before the law.

Arguments:

1. Yes. If everyone realizes the hazards it may create and cooperates to get rid of it, pollution may be controlled.
2. No. The crowded highways, factories and industries and an ever-growing population eager to acquire more and more land for constructing houses are beyond control.