Arguments:
Given:M < S<=T = R>=D > E>=F ...(i)
G<=S < H ...(ii)
Combining (i) and (ii), we get
G<=S<=T = R>=D > E>F andH > S<=T = R>=D > E>=F and
G<=S > M and M < S < H
(I) G = R is not true.
(II) G < R is not true.
But both are complamentary are pair.
(i) Q < R > P ... (ii)Combining both statements, we haveA > B < P < R > QNow, B < R is true.Hence, I follows.Again, We can?t compare A and Q. Thus, conclusion II does not follow.
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative. Also, the conclusion should not contain the middle term. So, 1 follows.
However, 2 is the converse of the second premise and thus it also holds.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.