logo

CuriousTab

CuriousTab

Discussion


Home Logical Reasoning Course of Action See What Others Are Saying!
  • Question
  • Statement: A very large number of students have failed in the final high school examination due to faulty questions in one of the subjects.

    Courses of Action:

    1. All the students who have failed in the subject should be allowed to take supplementary examination.
    2. All those who are responsible for the error should be suspended and an enquiry should be initiated to find out the facts.


  • Options
  • A. Only I follows
  • B. Only II follows
  • C. Either I or II follows
  • D. Neither I nor II follows
  • E. Both I and II follow

  • Correct Answer
  • Both I and II follow 

    Explanation
    There being faulty questions in the examination paper is a blunder on the part of school management and students should not be made to suffer on account of this. Thus, a re-test should be organised for the students and those responsible for the error be penalised to prevent reoccurrence of such mistake in the future. Hence, both the courses follow.

  • More questions

    • 1. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statement: 1. All elephants are men. 2. All men are socks. Conclusion I: Some socks are elephants. Conclusion II: All elephants are socks.

    • Options
    • A. Only Conclusion I follows
    • B. Only Conclusion II follows
    • C. Both Conclusions I and II follows
    • D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
    • Discuss
    • 2. In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement : Should rock shows be allowed to run till midnight at tourist places? Argument I : Yes, more tourists arrive due to rock shows. Tourism is good for local economy. Argument II : No, local traditions are harmed due to tourism.

    • Options
    • A. if only argument I is strong.
    • B. if only argument II is strong.
    • C. if both I and II are strong.
    • D. if neither I nor II is strong.
    • Discuss
    • 3. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be atvariance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No bikes are two-wheelers Statement II: All wheels are bikes Conclusion I: No two-wheelers are wheels Conclusion II: All wheels are two-wheelers

    • Options
    • A. Only conclusion I follows
    • B. Only conclusion II follows
    • C. Both conclusions I and II follow
    • D. Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
    • Discuss
    • 4. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statements: 1. All books are novels. 2. Some novels are poems. Conclusions: I. Some books are poems. II. Some poems are novels.

    • Options
    • A. Only conclusion I follows
    • B. Only conclusion II follows
    • C. Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
    • D. Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow
    • Discuss
    • 5. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statement 1: All animals are four-footed. 2. Dog has two legs. Conclusion I:Dog is not an animal. II. Dog is an animal.

    • Options
    • A. If only I follows
    • B. If only II follows
    • C. If neither I nor II follows
    • D. If both I and II follow
    • Discuss
    • 6. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statement:I All astronomers are scientists. Statement:II Some scientists are shopkeepers. Conclusion:I All astronomers are shopkeepers. Conclusion:II Some shopkeepers are astronomers. Conclusion:III Some shopkeepers are scientists. Conclusion:IV All scientists are astronomers.

    • Options
    • A. Only IConclusion follows
    • B. Conclusions I,IIandIIIfollows
    • C. Only conclusion IIIfollows
    • D. Conclusion IIand IV follows
    • Discuss
    • 7. I, II, III & IV. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements. Statements: 1. All teachers are actors. 2. Some actors are women. Conclusion: I. All teachers are women. II. Some women are teachers. III. Some women are actors. IV. All actors are teachers.

    • Options
    • A. Only Conclusion I follows
    • B. Only Conclusion II & IV follows
    • C. Only Conclusion III follows
    • D. None of the conclusions follows.
    • Discuss
    • 8. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statement:I Some bags are pockets. Statement:II No pocket is a pouch. Conclusion:I Some bags are not pouches. Conclusion:II Some pockets are bags.

    • Options
    • A. Only conclusion I follows
    • B. Only conclusion II follows
    • C. Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow
    • D. Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
    • Discuss
    • 9. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statements : 1. Some teacher are followers. 2. Some followers are famous. Conclusions : I. Some teachers are famous. II. Some followers are teachers.

    • Options
    • A. Only conclusion I follows
    • B. Only conclusion II follows
    • C. Both conclusion I and II follows
    • D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
    • Discuss
    • 10. Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. STATEMENT: Selectors pick our cricket teams based on regional considerations instead of on pure merit, making it difficult for our teams to win test series against other countries. Conclusion I: Our cricket teams have no hope of winning test series against other countries. Conclusion II: Our cricket teams need to be selected on pure merit.

    • Options
    • A. Only Conclusion I follows
    • B. Only Conclusion II follows
    • C. Both Conclusion I and II follows
    • D. Neither Conclusion I nor II follows
    • Discuss


    Comments

    There are no comments.

Enter a new Comment