Discussion
Home ‣ Logical Reasoning ‣ Course of Action See What Others Are Saying!
- Question
Statement: There has been an unprecedented increase in the number of successful candidates in this year's School Leaving Certificate Examination.
Courses of Action:
- The government should make arrangements to increase number of seats of intermediate courses in existing colleges.
- The government should take active steps to open new colleges to accommodate all these successful candidates.
Options- A. Only I follows
- B. Only II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow
- Correct Answer
- Only I follows
ExplanationThe increase may not be a permanent one. So, it's better not to open new colleges but increase seats in the existing colleges. So, only I follow. - 1. Should a total ban be put on traping wild animals? Arguments: 1. Yes. Trappers are making a lot of money 2. No. Bans on hunting and trapping are not effective
Options- A. Only 1 is true
- B. Only 2 is true
- C. Either 1 or 2 is true
- D. Neither 1 or 2 is true Discuss
- 2. Should cutting of trees be banned altogether? Arguments: I. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance. II. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Neither I nor II is strong
- D. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 3. Sould the railways in india be privatised in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises? Arguments: 1. Yes. This is the only way to bring in competativeness and provide better services 2. No. It leads to wastage of resources
Options- A. Only 1 is true
- B. Only 2 is true
- C. Either 1 or 2 is true
- D. Neither 1 nor 2 is true Discuss
- 4. Should school education be made free in India ? Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to improve the literacy rate in India. II. No. It would add the already heavy burden on the exchequer.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Neither I nor II is strong
- D. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 5. Should students take part in politics? Arguments: 1. Yes. It includes in the the quality of leader ship 2. No. They should study and build up their career
Options- A. Only 1 is true
- B. Only 2 is true
- C. Either 1 or 2 is true
- D. Neither 1 or 2 is true Discuss
- 6. Should religion be baned Arguments: 1. Yes. It develops fanaticism in people 2. No. Religion binds people together
Options- A. Only 1 is true
- B. Only 2 is true
- C. Either 1 or 2 is true
- D. Neither 1 nor 2 is true Discuss
- 7. Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports ? Arguments : I. Yes. This money can be utilised for poor. II. No. Sports-persons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.
Options- A. Only argument I is strong
- B. Only argument II is strong
- C. Neither I nor II is strong
- D. Both I and II are strong Discuss
- 8. A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: Should too much revealing dress be banned? Argument: 1. Yes, it disturbs the people and create abuse. 2. No, wearing cloths of their choice is the fundamental right of the individual
Options- A. Neither argument l and 2 is strong
- B. Only argument 1 is strong
- C. Only argument 2 is strong
- D. Either argument 1 or 2 is strong Discuss
- 9. Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I & II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument. Statement: Is global warming a real threat? Arguments : I. Yes, it is a threat leading to the consequences of sea level rise, extreme heat, heightened wildfire risk, and drought and other water supply issues. II. No, Global warming is a misconception created by some people.
Options- A. Only argument II is strong
- B. Neither I nor II is strong and
- C. Only argument I is strong
- D. Both I and II are strong. Discuss
- 10. A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: From tender age children must be trained to do household chores. Arguments: I. Yes, it will make them grow responsible for their work. II. No, it is enough that we send them to school as they learn everything there.
Options- A. Neither I nor II is strong.
- B. Only argument I is strong.
- C. Only argument II is strong.
- D. Both I and II are strong. Discuss
More questions
Correct Answer: Neither 1 or 2 is true
Explanation:
Ban is necessary to protect our natural envoirnment .So none of the argument is strong enough
Correct Answer: Both I and II are strong
Correct Answer: Neither 1 nor 2 is true
Explanation:
Privatization would no doubt lead to better services.But saying that 'this is the only ' is wrong
Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong
Explanation:
Making education free can not ensure full literacy. So argument I is vague. Argument II stands strong.
Correct Answer: Either 1 or 2 is true
Explanation:
Clearly ,indulgement in politics trains the students for future leader ship but it sways them from studies .So,either of argument 1 or 2 holds
Correct Answer: Either 1 or 2 is true
Explanation:
Religion binds the people together with the name of god.But at the same time it may create differences and ill-will amon people
Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong
Explanation:
Clearly spending money on sports can not be avoided merely for social economic problems. But Argument II is strong. Be a sports man and then think on this question.
Correct Answer: Only argument 2 is strong
Correct Answer: Only argument I is strong
Correct Answer: Only argument I is strong.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Logical Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.