Discussion
Home ‣ Logical Reasoning ‣ Logical Deduction Comments
- Question
Statements: All pens are roads. All roads are houses.
Conclusions:
- All houses are pens.
- Some houses are pens.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow
- Correct Answer
- Only conclusion II follows
ExplanationSince both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'All pens are houses'. II is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds. Since the term 'houses' is distributed in I without being distributed in any of the premises, so I does not follow. - 1. Statements: All boys are honest. Sachin is honest.
Conclusions:
- Sachin is a boy.
- All honest persons are boys.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 2. Statements: Some pastries are toffees. All toffees are chocolates.
Conclusions:
- Some chocolates are toffees.
- Some toffees are not pastries.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 3. Statements: All young scientists are open-minded. No open-minded men are superstitious.
Conclusions:
- No scientist is superstitious.
- No young people are superstitious.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 4. Statements: All men are dogs. All dogs are cats.
Conclusions:
- All men are cats.
- All cats are men.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 5. Statements: All water is divine. All temples are divine.
Conclusions:
- All water is temple.
- All temples are water.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 6. Statements: All artists are smokers. Some smokers are drunkards.
Conclusions:
- All smokers are artists.
- Some drunkards are not smokers.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 7. Statements: All cars are cats. All fans are cats.
Conclusions:
- All cars are fans
- Some fans are cars.
Options- A. Only conclusion I follows
- B. Only conclusion II follows
- C. Either I or II follows
- D. Neither I nor II follows
- E. Both I and II follow Discuss
- 8. SCD, TEF, UGH, ____, WKL
Options- A. CMN
- B. UJI
- C. VIJ
- D. IJT Discuss
- 9. B2CD, _____, BCD4, B5CD, BC6D
Options- A. B2C2D
- B. BC3D
- C. B2C3D
- D. BCD7 Discuss
- 10. FAG, GAF, HAI, IAH, ____
Options- A. JAK
- B. HAL
- C. HAK
- D. JAI Discuss
Logical Deduction problems
Search Results
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Both the premises are A type propositions. So, the middle term 'honest' forming the predicate in each is not distributed in either. Since the middle term is not distributed even once, no definite conclusion follows.
Correct Answer: Only conclusion I follows
Explanation:
Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. Thus, it follows that 'Some pastries are chocolates', I is the converse of the second premise and so it holds. Since both the premises are affirmative, the conclusion cannot be negative. Thus, II does not follow.
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
The subject in both the conclusions is vague. The true conclusion is 'No young scientist is superstitious'. Thus, neither I nor II follows,
Correct Answer: Only conclusion I follows
Explanation:
Since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative. However, conclusion II, being an A-type proposition, distributes the term 'cats'.
Since the term 'cats' is distributed in II without being distributed in any of the premises, so conclusion II cannot follow. Thus, only I follows.
Since the term 'cats' is distributed in II without being distributed in any of the premises, so conclusion II cannot follow. Thus, only I follows.
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Since the middle term 'divine' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion can be drawn.
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Since the middle term 'smokers' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Since the middle term 'cats' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.
Correct Answer: VIJ
Explanation:
There are two alphabetical series here. The first series is with the first letters only: STUVW. The second series involves the remaining letters: CD, EF, GH, IJ, KL.
Correct Answer: BC3D
Explanation:
Because the letters are the same, concentrate on the number series, which is a simple 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 series, and follows each letter in order.
Correct Answer: JAK
Explanation:
The middle letters are static, so concentrate on the first and third letters. The series involves an alphabetical order with a reversal of the letters. The first letters are in alphabetical order: F, G, H, I , J. The second and fourth segments are reversals of the first and third segments. The missing segment begins with a new letter.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Logical Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.