Statements: A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.
Conclusions:
We should be content with what we have.
We should not crave for what is not.
Options
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
Correct Answer
Both I and II follow
Explanation
Both the given conclusions clearly bring out the central theme of the proverb given in the statement. So, both I and II follow.
Statement and Conclusion problems
Search Results
1. Statements: In a recent survey report, it has been stated that those who undertake physical exercise for at least half an hour a day are less prone to have any heart ailments.
Conclusions:
Moderate level of physical exercise is necessary for leading a healthy life.
All people who do desk-bound jobs definitely suffer from heart ailments.
The statement mentions that chances of heart ailments are greatly reduced by a regular half-hour exercise. So, I follows. However, it talks of only reducing the probability which does not mean that persons involved in sedentary jobs shall definitely suffer from heart ailments. So, II does not follow.
2. Statements: The serious accident in which a person was run down by a car yesterday had again focused attention on the most unsatisfactory state of roads.
Conclusions:
The accident that occurred was fatal.
Several accidents have so far taken place because of unsatisfactory state of roads.
Since the accident has caused concern, it must be fatal. So, I follows. The use of the word 'again' in the statement justifies the fact mentioned in II. So, II also follows.
3. Statements: Vegetable prices are soaring in the market.
The availability of vegetables is not mentioned in the given statement. So, I does not follow Also, II is not directly related to the statement and so it also does not follow.
4. Statements: Money plays a vital role in politics.
Investment in securities involves risk. This does not mean that one should not invest in securities. So, I does not follow. Since the statement advises one to consult investment advisor before investing, so II follows.
6. Statements: This world is neither good nor evil; each man manufactures a world for himself.
The statement mentions that the world for a man is as he makes it himself. So, some people might find it good and some quite bad. Thus, both I and II follow.
7. Statements: The eligibility for admission to the course is minimum second class Master's degree. However, the candidates who have appeared for the final year examination of Master's degree can also apply.
Conclusions:
All candidates who have yet to get their Master's degree will be there in the list of selected candidates.
All candidates having obtained second class Master's degree will be there in the list of selected candidates.
The statement mentions that the candidates who have obtained second class Master's degree or have appeared for the final year examination of Master's degree, can apply for admission. This implies that both types of candidates may be selected on certain grounds. Thus, some candidates of each type and not all candidates of any one type, may be selected. So, neither I nor II follows.
8. Statements: Any student who does not behave properly while in the school brings bad name to himself and also for the school.
Conclusions:
Such student should be removed from the school.
Stricter discipline does not improve behaviour of the students.
Clearly, I cannot be deduced from the statement. Also, nothing about discipline is mentioned in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
9. Statements: A Corporate General Manager asked four managers to either submit their resignations by the next day or face termination orders from service. Three of them had submitted their resignations by that evening.
Conclusions:
The next day, the remaining manager would also resign.
The General Manager would terminate his services the next day.
It is mentioned in the statement that either the managers should resign by the next day or their services would be terminated. So, either I or II follows.
10. Statements: Only good singers are invited in the conference. No one without sweet voice is a good singer.
Conclusions:
All invited singers in the conference have sweet voice.
Those singers who do not have sweet voice are not invited in the conference.
The statement asserts that a good singer always has a sweet voice and only good singers are invited in the conference. This implies that all those invited in the conference have sweet voice and those who do not have sweet voice are not invited. So, both I and II follow.