Conclusions:
Arguments:
Courses of Action:
Assumptions:
Conclusions:
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative (E-type) and shouldn't contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No tiger is cow'.
Some camels are cows. No cow is lion.
Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative (O-type) and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some camels are not lions'. Some camels are cows. No tiger is cow.
Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative (O-type) and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some camels are not tigers'.
Assumptions:
Assumptions:
Fact 1: | Some pens don't write. |
Fact 2: | All blue pens write. |
Fact 3: | Some writing utensils are pens. |
I: | Some writing utensils don't write. |
II: | Some writing utensils are blue. |
III: | Some blue writing utensils don't write. |
Courses of Action:
Assumptions:
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.