Using Both 1 & 2 statements we get the rate of interest as in (1) we have given principle amount and in (2) compound interest for 2 years. By this data we get the rate%.
Using Both 1 & 3 statements we can get the rate% as we have principle amount & difference between compound interest and simple interest in 2 years.
Using Both 2 & 3 statements we get compound interest & simple interest by which we get principle amount. So that we can calculate %rate.
Hence by using any two of the three statements(1,2&3) we get rate of interest.
From statement (b)
Average of 11 players = 11 x 28 = 308
Average of 10 players = 10 x 27.3 = 273
Age of captain = 308 - 273 = 35.
From the Statement (a) we can say that captain's age (C) = y + 11 ...(1) where y-youngers age
From the statement (c),the averge age of 3groups of 3players each was given,
It means total 9 players age was given indirectly,
1st group: 25 x 3 = 75
2nd group: 28 x 3 = 84
3rd group: 30 x 3 = 90
Total is 75 + 84 + 90 = 249
Now {C + Y + (9 players age sum)}/11 = 28
Y + 11 + Y + (249) = 28 x 11=308
2Y+260=308
2Y = 308-260 = 40 ==> Y=24 ==> C(captain's age)= Y+11 = 24+11 = 35
Therefore, statement b alone or a & c only is the answer.
From the given Statements :
1. I > W > T > N
2. F = G = C
Conclusions are :
I. W > I (False)
II. C > N (True)
1 is the converse of 2nd premise,2 is the converse of 3rd premiseand 3 is the converse of 1st premise and such, all the 3 follow
Since each combiantion of premise contain 2 particular premises, no definite conclusion can be drawn. However, 1 and 4 involve the extreme terms of 2nd and 3rd premises and form a complementary pair. Thus either 1 or 4 follows.
I does not follow because it considers the qualities expressed in the statement sufficient for the eligibility of a job. II follows obviously.
From solving 1 and 2 we get,
1.
5a(a-3)-3(a-3) = 0
(5a-3)(a-3) = 0
a = 3 or 3/5
2.
3b(b+2)-1(b+2) = 0
b = -2 or b = 1/3
Here when a = 3, a > b for b = -2 and b = 1/3
when a = 3/5. a > b for b = -2 and b = 1/3.
Hence, it is clear that a > b.
All flowers are toys. Some toys are trees
Since the middle term 'toys' is not distributed even once in the premises,no definite conclusion follows.
Some toys are trees. Some angels are trees
Since both premises are particular,no definite conclusion an be drawn
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.