Clearly, independent judiciary is necessary for impartial judgements so that the executive does'nt take wrong measures.So only argument 1 holds
clearly argument 1 holds strong,while argument 2 is vague
Making education free can not ensure full literacy. So argument I is vague. Argument II stands strong.
Nowadays, computers have entered all walks of life and children need to be prepared for the same. So, argument II is strong. Argument I holds no relevance.
I is strong because pollution control is highly desirable. II is weak. There may be some inconvenience initially but in fact their families would live better lives in the outskirts.
1 does'nt provide a strong reason in upport of te statement.Also ,it is not possible to analyze the reallydeserving and not deserving.So 2 holds true
Clearly.India need to maintain military force inorder to defend itself againsts the threats of other military powers in the world.So,none of the arguments holds strong
Clearly ,indulgement in politics trains the students for future leader ship but it sways them from studies .So,either of argument 1 or 2 holds
Government jobs in rural are underlined with several difficulties in love of these .In lieu of these ,extra incentives are needed
Import of sugar is directly related with the domestic production of sugar. If import of sugar is banned then it will result in hoarding of sugar besides increase in its prices (due to less supply than the requirement). Hence I is strong. Note that availability of a commodity keeps the prices of the commodity under control. Hence, II is strong.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.