Ban is necessary to protect our natural envoirnment .So none of the argument is strong enough
A person who balances all the three healths such as Physical, mental and Social healths has the best overall health.
In such a cataclysmic scenario, the govt is likely to order the closure of offices and schools
Increase in water level of all water tanks and the problem of water -logging on the tracks are the result of increase of water availability or surplus of water (due to rain). Hence, both the events are effects of the same cause.
Brift means the root word mili; the suffix amint means the same as the English suffix ?tant; the root word ufton? means occupy; el means the suffix ?ied of occupied; and alene means the suffix ?tion. (Because ufton means occupy, choices a, b, and d can be easily ruled out.)
Free passes given to the railway employees is a privilage to them not their right.So 1 does'nt hold and 2 is vague
Clearly, defence is necessary for the safety of the country, which is of prime importance. So, argument I holds. Also, a country can concentrate on internal progress and development only when it is safe from external aggressions. So, argument II does not hold.
Delinking jobs with degrees will diminish the need for higher education as amny of them persue such education for jobs.So, only arg 2 is strong
Simply saying that a thing can be abused is a simplistic argument. This applies to everything and is hence weak unless you specify the reason for abuse. Hence I is weak. II is weak because it is just not true.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.