Since sum is 360 hence P + Q + R + S = 360
From statement I alone we will get P = (Q + R + S)/3 from this we can find the value of P hence statement I alone is sufficient enough.
From statement II alone we can not find the value of P.
Statement I is not sufficient as the size of the ice cube and height of the container is not known hence statement I is not sufficient alone.
Statement I is not sufficient as the dimension of the container is not known.
We cannot answer the question even by combining both the statement as the height of the container is not known.
It is given that Ram got a dividend of ? 1500.
Statement I
Knowing the dividend paid last year, we cannot find the dividend paid this year.
Statement II
Given that Ram bought 350 shares of face value ? 10, and so, their total face value is ?3500. So, here we know the investment and the return hence wen can find out the rate of interest.
from I: Two-digit marks is less than or equal to 20.
Possible marks: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20
From II: Suman scored more than 9 marks.
Possible marks: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20
Hence statement I and II together are not sufficient.
From I: The possible day of exam is Wednesday.
From II. The third day of the week is Wednesday.
Hence, either statement I alone or statement II alone is sufficient.
From I: Possible months: January, February, March, April, May or June.
From II: Rahul's son correctly remembers that his father went on vacation after 31st March but before 1st May. So, his father went on vacation in the month of April. Hence only II is sufficient.
Let the 7 consecutive whole numbers be (n ± 3), (n ± 2), (n ± 1), n.
Now i we consider Statement I alone
Product of these 7 integers = 702800
Since 702800 = 24 52 (251)(7), it cannot be the product of 7 consecutive whole numbers. Hence I alone is insufficient.
Now if we consider Statement II alone
Given that their sum = 105 = 7n or n = 15 and then 7 consecutive integers are 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 So, II alone is sufficient.
If we look at Statement I
It is given that the circle are concentric. But nothing is given about their dimensions. Hence I alone is not sufficient.
In statement II ratio of area is given hence we can find the required ratio.
If we look at Statement I
i = p - 17 and r = p - 103
Hence, we cannot ind how many each received so this statement is not sufficient enough.
Now by considering Statement II alone.
p + i + r = 170
Hence, we cannot find how many each received. so, this statement is not sufficient enough.
Using I sand II together, we get the value of p and the value of q and r.
If we look at statement I then we will get
If a = 3 and b = 2, a + b > 0. Here b > 0
If a = 3 and b = -2, a + b > 0. Here b < 0
Hence I alone is not sufficient.
Now if we look at Statement II only then we will get
if a = 3 and b 2, a - b > 0. Here b > 0
If a = 3 and b = -2, a - b > 0. Here b < 0
Hence II alone is not sufficient.
Now by using statements I and II together
If a = 3 and b = 2, a - b > 0 and a + b > 0. Here b > 0
If a = 3 and b = -2, a - b > 0. and a + b > 0. Here b < 0.
Hence I and II together are also insufficient.
Consider Statement I alone
Given that Area (?ABC) = Area(?PQR) since nothing about the sides or angles is mentioned, we can not say if they are congruent.Hence, I alone is not sufficient.
Consider Statement II alone
?ABC and ?PQR are right triangles. Nothing about the sides is given, Hence, II alone is not sufficient. Now using both I and II
Now we have two right angled triangle k with same area we may have different combination as only product of base and height is same. Hence even by using both the statement we can not find the answer.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.