Even by using both the statements together we can only determine that number of candidates appeared was more than 200.
Using Statement I: If ken turns 90° towards his right he will face South. So, Ali is facing north.
Using Statement II: In the end Priya faces north. So, Ali also faces north.
From I: C > A > B and - > D
From II: -> - > C. Comblining, we get E > D > C > A > B.
Using either of the statements alone we cannot find the answer, but when we use both the statements together we can find the answer, but when we use both the statements together we can find the relation in term of weight,
i.e. K > J > W > P > M, T.
Using either of the statements alone we cannot find the code, and even by using both the statements together we can only find that 'never ever' is coded as 'na ja' the code for 'never' cannot be uniquely determined even by using both the statements together.
Using Statement I:
II ? Suresh ? 21 ? Mohan ? 16
So, there are 21 students between Suresh and Mohan
Using Statement II:
Mohan's name is not even mentioned in the given statement so we cannot find the answer using statement II alone.
Even by using both the statements together we cannot determine the gender of B. So, A can have one or two brothers.
Using I:
T 5 R and T is midway between P and Q
Using II:
R 2 Q
Using both:
P 7 T 5 R 2 Q
I. Using I only, we cannot determine that G stays on 4th floor.
I. Raju can take 4 to 8 days to complete the work.
II. Raju can take 8 to 10 days to complete the work.
Using both the statements together we can determine that Raju took 8 days to complete the work.
if the data in Statements II alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in Statement I alone are not sufficient to answer the question.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.