Using Statement I:
A C B D
Position of E Cannot be found it can be left of A or right of D.
Using Statement II: Many seating arrangements are possible
Using both: E A C B D is the unique arrangement are that is possible and C sits in the middle.
Using Statement I:
a letter ? '71'
Using Statement II:
'in' ? '4'
Using both:
'Greek' ? '5' and 'received ? '3'
Code for 'letter' cannot be found even by using both statements together.
From I: Bharat has two siblings but we don't know their sex.
From I: We don't known whether B is to the west or east of C. In fact, it could be in any other direction.
From II: Obviously A is west of B.
In I, Sex of T is not known. In II, Q does not figure. Hence we need both the statements to establish the relationship.
From I: If all of them face the centre, it means if A sits second to the left of B, then B should sit second to the right of A. But here Amit and Arun are different persons. Hence all of them do not face the centre
From II: Again suppose of them face the centre like KEN. Ali sits third to the left of ken. Now, if Amit sits on the left of Ali obviously ken should be his neighbour. But the statement says otherwise. Hence our assumption is disproved. All of them do not face the centre.
Using Statement I:
We get two arrangement, ie
5 ? B E
4 ? A C
3 ? D or B
2 ? C A
1 ? E D
Using Statement II: Many arrangements are possible.
Using Statement I: From the line "Yasir sits on the immediate right of Abhay as well as Kavita" we
can conclude that one of Abhay and Kavita is facing towards the centre and the outside So, all friends are Not facing the centre.
Using Statement I: C is not in the statement. So using I only we can never find the relation between R and C. Using Statement II: R is not in the statement .So using II only we can never find the relation between R and C.Using both: We can conclude that R is the granddaughter of C.
Using Statement I:
II ? Suresh ? 21 ? Mohan ? 16
So, there are 21 students between Suresh and Mohan
Using Statement II:
Mohan's name is not even mentioned in the given statement so we cannot find the answer using statement II alone.
Using either of the statements alone we cannot find the code, and even by using both the statements together we can only find that 'never ever' is coded as 'na ja' the code for 'never' cannot be uniquely determined even by using both the statements together.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.